Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 1

Meeting type

Organisation

Question by 2

Status

Year

  • PPP Arbiter

    • Reference: 2007/0174-1
    • Question by: Sally Hamwee
    • Meeting date: 05 December 2007
    On what grounds could you take a case to court if the PPP Arbiter rules that London Underground owes the Metronet administrator substantial sums for cost overruns?

  • Access to Hospitals

    • Reference: 2007/0181-1
    • Question by: Sally Hamwee
    • Meeting date: 05 December 2007
    What priority is TfL giving to ensure that there is bus access to hospitals, and that bus stops on hospital sites are given priority over car-parks?

  • ERCC (1)

    • Reference: 2007/0263-1
    • Question by: Angie Bray
    • Meeting date: 05 December 2007
    When can we expect TfL to reveal the full extent of the opposition it has received to the Emissions Related Congestion Charge?

  • ERCC (2)

    • Reference: 2007/0264-1
    • Question by: Angie Bray
    • Meeting date: 05 December 2007
    How much opposition to the Emissions Related Congestion Charge would the Commissioner have to receive before he would seriously reconsider a proposal which will fail to improve congestion, which will increase the number of cars entering the Congestion Zone, which will have a minimal effect on London's CO2 output and which will not improve London's air quality?

  • Cycle Provision

    • Reference: 2007/0265-1
    • Question by: Angie Bray
    • Meeting date: 05 December 2007
    Is TfL satisfied with the level of bicycle parking provision at Ealing Broadway station?

  • One-way Systems (Supplementary) [4]

    • Question by: Angie Bray
    • Meeting date: 05 December 2007
    I wonder if I could talk to you about the famous - or at least the notorious - Hanger Lane gyratory system. I remember when I first started at LBC radio, as I was learning to do the traffic news, we found that that was one of the systems that we constantly described every day in the traffic news as being a nightmare, and it is a nightmare. I wonder whether that is a gyratory system that you would look at, but on the other hand, if you were to look at it, I cannot for the life of me...

  • Staffing at Overground Stations (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Angie Bray
    • Meeting date: 05 December 2007
    This is all waste material left over from the floods, making it very slippery, and there is a lot of urinating in the tunnel underneath and a lot of bird droppings, which are making it incredibly dangerous to walk through.

  • Staffing at Overground Stations (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Angie Bray
    • Meeting date: 05 December 2007
    Can I write to you about that then?

  • Staffing at Overground Stations (Supplementary) [4]

    • Question by: Angie Bray
    • Meeting date: 05 December 2007
    I wondered whether the remit of the staff on the Overground will be in part to look after and maintain the bridges over which the overland trains run. I have had my attention drawn to a particular bridge where it is in a disgraceful state of disrepair and the flood damage from the summer has not even been touched yet. Is that something which now falls to the staff of the Overground or is that still a Network Rail issue?

  • £25 congestion charge (Supplementary) [5]

    • Question by: Angie Bray
    • Meeting date: 05 December 2007
    What about the point about the disproportionate nature of what happens here? If you are looking at people living inside the Congestion Charge zone, the residents who normally get a discount, you are effectively saying that if you are just 1g over your arbitrary cut off point, you go from 80 pence a day to £25 a day. Would you not agree that by any stretch of the imagination, that has to be seen as disproportionate?