Search questions

• Reference: 2007/0174-1
• Question by: Sally Hamwee
• Meeting date: 05 December 2007

On what grounds could you take a case to court if the PPP Arbiter rules that London Underground owes the Metronet administrator substantial sums for cost overruns?

• Reference: 2007/0181-1
• Question by: Sally Hamwee
• Meeting date: 05 December 2007

What priority is TfL giving to ensure that there is bus access to hospitals, and that bus stops on hospital sites are given priority over car-parks?

• Question by: Sally Hamwee
• Meeting date: 06 December 2006

This is not a personal complaint, Peter!

• Question by: Sally Hamwee
• Meeting date: 06 December 2006

Thank you for that. It is intended to be a constructive question as well as asking about constructive engagement. I think I have been asked to do it so that it was not Geoff [Pope] getting at you all the way through the meeting! I am glad to hear that because that was not one of the suggestions that was agreed before, and perhaps that can be taken forward both for you, as Commissioner, and others in TfL. There has been a reference this morning to difficulties about responses. Thank you for putting in place a liaison person. The experience...

• Question by: Sally Hamwee
• Meeting date: 06 December 2006

The closure of the Waterloo and City line after Metronet had failed to clear the dust I am told: `Still no helpful facts six hours after the incident'. The PPP Arbiter's report, that was published at 7.30 am, I understand that Members and Members' staff were excluded from TfL's press conference at 11.30am and were not able to talk to TfL until 1pm the following day.

• Reference: 2006/0527-1
• Question by: Sally Hamwee
• Meeting date: 06 December 2006

How can the Assembly arrive at a situation where we engage more constructively with Transport for London?

• Reference: 2006/0465-1
• Question by: Len Duvall OBE
• Meeting date: 06 December 2006

Given TfL's proposal to substantially reduce the car parking at North Greenwich station what steps have they taken to provide alternative parking and how do they intend to secure the future of this car park given London Underground's description of this station as a key gateway? This park and ride facility is used by my constituents from all parts of Greenwich as public transport to and from the station from some parts of the borough is inadequate. Reducing car parking will not encourage people to use public transport, as many will find it quicker to drive into central London or...

• Reference: 2006/0476-1
• Question by: Len Duvall OBE
• Meeting date: 06 December 2006

Can you clarify what will be the exact staffing arrangements at the stations on the East London Line extension? Will there be staff at the stations and ticket barriers all the time the trains are running?

• Reference: 2006/0525-1
• Question by: Len Duvall OBE
• Meeting date: 06 December 2006

Are there any plans to introduce light controlled pedestrian crossings on a) Courthill Road, Lewisham, at the junction with Lewisham High Street and b) Canadian Avenue, Catford at the junction with Catford Road?

• Reference: 2006/0019-1
• Question by: Len Duvall OBE
• Meeting date: 15 March 2006

Will TfL consider beginning a feasibility study on a third crossing at Blackwall?