Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 1

Meeting type

Organisation

Question by

Status

Year

  • Strategic Views (Supplementary) [13]

    • Question by: Tony Arbour
    • Meeting date: 11 July 2001
    Do I understand from what you are saying that there could be new strategic views and the existing strategic views could be improved? Presumably improved by new build of tall buildings which are often simply no more than corporate virility symbols?

  • Performance Indicators (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Jennette Arnold OBE
    • Meeting date: 11 July 2001
    My interest is that that has brought about a clarity which I certainly did not have and I know a number of other people did not have. But can I just ask you in two parts, can you do all that over a year, given that you have just said you started in May? Because I understand your contract is for a year. And you have talked about the SDS and we have only seen a document that is entitled "Towards the SDS" which, as I understand it, has got this ever growing life of its own. So if you...

  • Performance Indicators (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Jennette Arnold OBE
    • Meeting date: 11 July 2001
    Will you be producing a report so that we will know that this is, if you like, what Rogers did in his year with the GLA?

  • Performance Indicators (Supplementary) [3]

    • Question by: Jennette Arnold OBE
    • Meeting date: 11 July 2001
    Lord Rogers, I thought I was just getting some sense about what I have been hearing and then I have got lost again so let me just seek to clarify. Are you saying that once you have made a decision about these two sites, are you saying that that work will then be fed into the work of the spatial development plan? In terms of your accountability I still do not get a feel in terms of where your work fits in to the strategic hold of the Authority. Is it too soon? How will you relate to the spatial...

  • Richard Roger's Appointment (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Brian Coleman
    • Meeting date: 11 July 2001
    Lord Rogers, you are on a 12-month contract for a fee of, I believe, £130,000. Do you think that is value for money for Londoners?

  • Richard Roger's Appointment (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Brian Coleman
    • Meeting date: 11 July 2001
    I think the problem is the GLA does not think it is worth it but the Mayor thinks it is. It does seem extraordinary. Do you believe in civic duty, Lord Rogers?

  • Richard Roger's Appointment (Supplementary) [3]

    • Question by: Roger Evans
    • Meeting date: 11 July 2001
    Obviously you seem hopeful that your contract will be extended beyond the initial year and into the future to work with us. If that is the case will you be happy to work in the new GLA headquarters with the rest of us and what do you think the advantages are that we can look forward to from working in a building that is as transparent and functional as the table we are sitting at this morning?

  • Richard Roger's Appointment (Supplementary) [4]

    • Question by: Roger Evans
    • Meeting date: 11 July 2001
    Can you tell us what features you think the new City Hall for the Mayor and London Authority should embody and how you would have designed it if it had been your task?

  • Richard Roger's Appointment (Supplementary) [5]

    • Question by: Roger Evans
    • Meeting date: 11 July 2001
    So in a political headquarters should there be more open plan or more quiet spaces?

  • Richard Roger's Appointment (Supplementary) [6]

    • Question by: Samantha Heath
    • Meeting date: 11 July 2001
    On what planning applications have you given formal or informal advice to the Mayor?