Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 2

  • LFEPA Cuts and the Safety of Londoners (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Roger Evans
    • Meeting date: 02 December 2015
    Roger Evans AM: If you consider the 13 appliances that you are considering taking away plus the ones that were removed before, I believe the saving is around £25 million. If by some miracle you were to have £25 million returned to your budget, Commissioner, would you ideally spend it on putting those appliances back or would you have other priorities that you think would keep London safer?
  • LFEPA Cuts and the Safety of Londoners (Supplementary) [5]

    • Question by: James Cleverly
    • Meeting date: 02 December 2015
    James Cleverly AM MP: I am happy for either the Commissioner or the Chairman to answer this. When the traditional disposition of London’s fire stations was brought about, I suppose, with the early 20th century expansion, is it fair to say that fire and fire risk was the single biggest driving factor in the equipment disposition of fire stations and fire appliances?
  • Impact of climate change on your work (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Roger Evans
    • Meeting date: 02 December 2015
    Roger Evans AM: I just wanted to add my support to Jenny’s suggestion that fire prevention people might look at flood prevention as well. I wondered if there was also a role for them to do some joint working with the MPS on crime prevention because at the moment we have fire prevention people who go out and tell people largely to provide more means of exit and entrance from their properties and then crime prevention people who go around and tell them to lock them up. Might it not be better if the two services worked together and more...
  • New Technology (Supplementary) [3]

    • Question by: Andrew Boff
    • Meeting date: 02 December 2015
    Andrew Boff AM: On the subject of safety, on 25 November 2015 there was a fire at a tyre shop in Walpole Road, N17. This shop has now reopened. Is it standard practice for there to be an investigation or an inspection subsequent to an incident and could you write to me and say whether or not there has been an inspection of these particular premises? The reason I chase this with you is that there have been some concerns from local residents for a considerable period but they do not seem to be getting any joy from Haringey Council...
  • Outer London Boroughs

    • Reference: 2001/0098-1
    • Question by: Andrew Pelling
    • Meeting date: 11 July 2001
    What support and service do you feel that you and your unit will be able to give to Outer London Boroughs seeking to re-invigorate district centres and develop key derelict sites? Specifically in South London what kind of action do you feel could be pursued to boost district centres like Norbury, Coulsdon, Purley, Worcester Park and Wallington that sit astride key FtL roads full of heavy traffic and to get development off the ground at key sites like the Croydon Gateway site at East Croydon? .
  • High Density Housing

    • Reference: 2001/0052-1
    • Question by: Eric Ollerenshaw
    • Meeting date: 11 July 2001
    What evidence do you have that Londoners want to live in high density areas? .
  • Public Transport

    • Reference: 2001/0055-1
    • Question by: Angie Bray
    • Meeting date: 11 July 2001
    In 1992 you wrote with Mark Fisher: "Severely limiting cars in London could be effective only if investment were made in high quality public alternatives." (A New London, Penguin London 1992 p xxiii). What investment has been made in public transport in the last four years and what investment do you believe is still needed before car use can be reduced? (A New London, 1992) .
  • Tall Buildings

    • Reference: 2001/0053-1
    • Question by: Tony Arbour
    • Meeting date: 11 July 2001
    What is the appropriate use for tall buildings? Does this predicate their siting? .
  • Alternatives to New Building

    • Reference: 2001/0054-1
    • Question by: Elizabeth Howlett
    • Meeting date: 11 July 2001
    In 1997 you said: "Organisations such as LOTS (Living Over The Shop) claim that at least 200,000 permanent homes could be provided above shops and commercial premises in inner London alone." (Cities for a Small Planet, p 119) Why has this option been largely ignored in the Mayor's Towards the London Plan? .
  • Combined Heat and Power Plants

    • Reference: 2001/0056-1
    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 11 July 2001
    Given the recent concerns about emissions from incinerators, what do you think is the future for combined heat and power plants in London? Where do you think they should be located? (Cities for a small planet, 1997) .