Search questions

• Question by: Len Duvall OBE
• Meeting date: 07 March 2012

Earlier, in terms of the answers to the business plan - sorry, I really ought to caveat this before anyone says I am nitpicking. Amongst the many hundreds, possibly thousands of things that you have done well, and the things that Members are raising - and you cannot get any bigger cheerleaders for the Olympics, certainly on this side today, but in the past, it took a long time coming. Let us put those caveats aside. These issues: Bhopal, ticketing, transparency. Are they not just slightly tarnishing? I was a bit gobsmacked when a key programme like Dispatches - I...

• Reference: 2006/0128-1
• Question by: Sally Hamwee
• Meeting date: 11 October 2006

Can you provide an overview of the London Organising Committee for the Olympic Games and Paralympic Games and what you have achieved so far?

• Question by: Sally Hamwee
• Meeting date: 10 October 2006

A year before the occasion that Darren mentioned, there was a letter sent to London Citizens to which you, Seb, were a signatory, which said indeed that the strategies would be informed by the commitment to identify a living wage. I accept that is not a commitment but in line with your concerns about transparency, how are Londoners to know to what extent your decisions are informed by that?

• Reference: 2006/0238-1
• Question by: Sally Hamwee
• Meeting date: 10 October 2006

Will you commit to a `Living Wage' for everyone, including contractors and sub-contractors, that is employed by LOCOG? If there are legal obstacles to a commitment, what steps will you take to deal with the need for a `Living Wage'?