Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 2

  • Proposal to Designate a Mayoral Development Area (Supplementary) [5]

    • Question by: Stephen Knight
    • Meeting date: 17 December 2014
    Stephen Knight AM: Just one quick point and that is, is it legally possible to spend Section 106 or CIL money outside the boundary of a planning authority?
  • Proposal to Designate a Mayoral Development Area (Supplementary) [6]

    • Question by: Murad Qureshi
    • Meeting date: 17 December 2014
    Murad Qureshi AM: Can I raise two or three issues. The first one, Eddie, I am grateful that you mentioned the canals at the outset. It is just unfortunate they do not show up on the maps. I have no doubts that residential developers will be eying those canal sides very eagerly, because I suspect they can enhance the values of the developments by up to 40%. That is the residential side. However, I am more concerned that they are used during the works construction on the site. I think this is going to be a huge development site, over...
  • Proposal to Designate a Mayoral Development Area (Supplementary) [9]

    • Question by: Jennette Arnold OBE
    • Meeting date: 17 December 2014
    Jenette Arnold OBE (Deputy Chair): I have a couple of questions, one for Sir Eddie, and one for Victoria Hills. Sir Eddie, in your introduction you mentioned that the Old Oak and Park Royal Development Corporation (OPDC) master plan was similar to the blueprint adopted by the LLDC. I know, as one of the three Assembly Members for the area covered by the LLDC, and was heavily involved in the consultation and now I keep a very strong watching brief on what is going on, that many aspects of the LLDC’s vision has changed. For instance, the LLDC plan started...
  • Proposal to Designate a Mayoral Development Area (Supplementary) [11]

    • Question by: Richard Tracey
    • Meeting date: 17 December 2014
    Richard Tracey AM: Thank you, Mr Chairman. Edward, can I first of all thank you for organising for the letter to Kit Malthouse [AM] about Wormwood Scrubs, which of course has been circulated to all of us. All of us on this side have received emails from many people who certainly were not constituents of ours but had some concerns, so I think it has helped very much to clarify, and I am grateful to Kit for writing to the Mayor about it. First of all though, I was going to say there is a lot of experience in this...
  • Investing in Tobacco Companies (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Mike Tuffrey
    • Meeting date: 13 September 2006
    The Labour Council did not vote against it, I understand.
  • Investing in Tobacco Companies (Supplementary) [5]

    • Question by: Jennette Arnold OBE
    • Meeting date: 13 September 2006
    No, I was adding it to the statistics that he has used, so that he can use that in future.
  • TfL Street Management Efficiency and Probity (Supplementary) [6]

    • Question by: Valerie Shawcross
    • Meeting date: 13 September 2006
    I think it is not just the efficiency that has been improved, but they have actually reduced their risk to probity now, but anyway, thank you. I will go back to TfL with some of the detail. Thank you.
  • Safe Access to Licensed Minicabs (Supplementary) [4]

    • Question by: Valerie Shawcross
    • Meeting date: 12 July 2006
    I think we have to put some positive incentives to minicab drivers, having gone through the registration scheme. I think it would help reinforce what is a successful safety scheme
  • Racism

    • Reference: 2001/0545
    • Question by: Jennette Arnold OBE
    • Meeting date: 19 September 2001
    Does the Mayor agree with Andrew Lansley MP that the Conservative Party is endemically racist? Does this explain the lack of Black or Asian Assembly members in Tory seats on the Assembly? .
  • Bus Fares & Travelcards

    • Reference: 2001/0555
    • Question by: Meg Hillier
    • Meeting date: 19 September 2001
    Your Transport Strategy states Transport for London's intention of introducing a flat rate 70p bus fare in late 2002, making the 'zoning' system irrelevant to pay-as-you-ride bus travel. What will be the fate, when travelling by bus, of passengers holding a travelcard valid only in a few zones? .