Search questions

• Question by: Jenny Jones
• Meeting date: 17 March 2004

• Question by: Jenny Jones
• Meeting date: 17 March 2004

I am just astonished that so much planning can go on before you actually understand the size of the risk. There are aspects to the development which are clearly going to go ahead before you have the full report.

• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 10 December 2003

Given that those responsible for racist and sexist behaviour in the force have often been responsible for homophobic behaviour as well, can you outline how homophobia is tackled as part of the programme of initiatives that Toby outlined?

• Reference: 2003/0305
• Question by: Noel Lynch
• Meeting date: 15 October 2003

What standards will you set and who will you involve to make London's Olympics exemplary in terms of sustainability and environmental impact? .

• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 15 October 2003

• Question by: Noel Lynch
• Meeting date: 15 October 2003

When are you going to set the standards, and who will actually formulate standards? You did an awful lot of waffling with that answer, I must say. There is nothing solid in it. I am quite disappointed.

• Question by: Noel Lynch
• Meeting date: 15 October 2003

When are you going to set the standards? Who will formulate the standards?

• Reference: 2003/0251
• Question by: Noel Lynch
• Meeting date: 11 June 2003

What residual powers will be retained by LUL / TfL when the Underground stations are transferred by lease to the private infracos? In particular, will the private infracos be completely free (subject to planning controls) to develop station space above or around station sites commercially for maximum profit? .

• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 11 June 2003

Just as Bob said the absence of graffiti on the network would give vital reassurance to people in terms of safety, do you not agree that the presence of staff on the stations provides the same sort of vital reassurance to people on safety issues? It is not only going to be psychological; it is also going to be practical. There will be practical benefits of tackling graffiti, safety, crime issues, or whatever and you do need a visible presence there. CCTV cameras in themselves will not be sufficient. You do need to maintain that staff presence.

• Question by: Noel Lynch
• Meeting date: 11 June 2003

And if the public are totally against it?