Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 1

Meeting type

Organisation

Question by 2

Status

Year

  • Cost of Capital City and Security Functions

    • Reference: 2003/0434
    • Question by: Tony Arbour
    • Meeting date: 10 December 2003
    Has research been undertaken within the MPS to examine if the funding from the Home Office for capital city and security functions fully meets the true cost of providing these services, and if so, what were its conclusions? .

  • Private Infracos

    • Reference: 2003/0251
    • Question by: Noel Lynch
    • Meeting date: 11 June 2003
    What residual powers will be retained by LUL / TfL when the Underground stations are transferred by lease to the private infracos? In particular, will the private infracos be completely free (subject to planning controls) to develop station space above or around station sites commercially for maximum profit? .

  • Private Infracos (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Noel Lynch
    • Meeting date: 11 June 2003
    And if the public are totally against it?

  • Private Infracos (Supplementary) [5]

    • Question by: Noel Lynch
    • Meeting date: 11 June 2003
    You are saying that the objective is to make more money, rather than to take into account any local impact on business in the area?

  • Private Infracos (Supplementary) [6]

    • Question by: Noel Lynch
    • Meeting date: 11 June 2003
    I am bothered by Camden, where it is opposed by practically everybody including the Civic Society, the Architects' Forum, and all the residents and businesses there. We are just worried that we will see these types of corporate, soulless developments all over London, with the destruction of the local community.