Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 1

  • Young People

    • Reference: 2003/0467-1
    • Question by: Graham Tope
    • Meeting date: 10 December 2003
    What is being done to address the particular concerns that children and young people have in relation to crime in the capital .
  • Access

    • Reference: 2003/0463-1
    • Question by: Lynne Featherstone
    • Meeting date: 10 December 2003
    What progress has been made in making police services in London more accessible? " .
  • PCSOs

    • Reference: 2003/0465-1
    • Question by: Lynne Featherstone
    • Meeting date: 10 December 2003
    Have there been any problems with the introduction of PCSOs? If so, what changes if any will be made to their role? What has the public reaction been? .
  • Racism in the MPS

    • Reference: 2003/0468-1
    • Question by: Lynne Featherstone
    • Meeting date: 10 December 2003
    What progress has been made in setting up an inquiry into the handling of internal investigations and grievances within the Metropolitan Police Service? .
  • Young People (Supplementary) [3]

    • Question by: Graham Tope
    • Meeting date: 10 December 2003
    Graham Tope (AM): I did want to concentrate today on young people as victims of crime. Every London borough has amongst its top three priorities dealing with anti-social behaviour and whilst that is a priority in every borough it does tend to reinforce the stereotype, the image of young people as the perpetrators and as the problem and does not adequately recognise that more often they are the victims. In terms of talking and working with young people, one of the objectives in the MPS youth strategy is to provide an environment for young people who are victims or witnesses...
  • Paying for Local Policing (Supplementary) [5]

    • Question by: Lynne Featherstone
    • Meeting date: 10 December 2003
    Going back to the increased need for funding and the question of who pays if services are expanded. I think we have noticed here at the Assembly that if we put something in our budget like resilience the Government then does not fund it; the same with the income from Congestion Charging and local grants. Of course, now London funds many of the extra police officers and the Government has rewarded us with a £56 million deduction in our grant. Would Toby Harris agree that the Government cannot have it both ways as we discussed yesterday? They cannot claim credit...
  • Paying for Local Policing (Supplementary) [10]

    • Question by: Lynne Featherstone
    • Meeting date: 10 December 2003
    No, that is not exactly what I am asking you to do.
  • Paying for Local Policing (Supplementary) [11]

    • Question by: Lynne Featherstone
    • Meeting date: 10 December 2003
    Will he agree therefore to write to the Home Secretary and ask him to deduct from the Government's claim for credit the numbers of police that London's paying for?
  • Paying for Local Policing (Supplementary) [12]

    • Question by: Lynne Featherstone
    • Meeting date: 10 December 2003
    So you can discuss it in private and not report it?
  • Step Change and Public Expectations (Supplementary) [14]

    • Question by: Graham Tope
    • Meeting date: 10 December 2003
    If Step Change is as successful as we all hope it is, then obviously it will create that sort of public demand and the demand to have it spread. Whilst I might share the aspirations of the Chair that this will persuade whoever is in Government to provide additional resources, if they do not " and I have to say there is no indication that they will at this stage " how can we go ahead to meet those public expectations that we helped to create?