Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 1

  • Young People

    • Reference: 2003/0467-1
    • Question by: Graham Tope
    • Meeting date: 10 December 2003
    What is being done to address the particular concerns that children and young people have in relation to crime in the capital .
  • Step Change - Infrastructure Costs

    • Reference: 2003/0419
    • Question by: Elizabeth Howlett
    • Meeting date: 10 December 2003
    The MPS step change business case makes clear that increased infrastructure provision will be required if the step change programme is to be fully effective. How much will this increased infrastructure add on to the total cost of the step change programme? .
  • MPA Role on CDRPs

    • Reference: 2003/0438
    • Question by: Elizabeth Howlett
    • Meeting date: 10 December 2003
    How will the MPA use its statutory role on Borough CDRPs to make them more effective? .
  • Young People (Supplementary) [3]

    • Question by: Graham Tope
    • Meeting date: 10 December 2003
    Graham Tope (AM): I did want to concentrate today on young people as victims of crime. Every London borough has amongst its top three priorities dealing with anti-social behaviour and whilst that is a priority in every borough it does tend to reinforce the stereotype, the image of young people as the perpetrators and as the problem and does not adequately recognise that more often they are the victims. In terms of talking and working with young people, one of the objectives in the MPS youth strategy is to provide an environment for young people who are victims or witnesses...
  • Bromley (Supplementary) [6]

    • Question by: Elizabeth Howlett
    • Meeting date: 10 December 2003
    As link member for Bromley, I just wonder, Lord Harris, whether in fact you have the right information. The Chief Superintendent has managed to change the duty roster and he also has a charging unit for the sergeant that runs it so that when an officer comes in with an offender he is handed over to the charging unit. The officer is then able to go out on to the streets again, which increases visibility. I wonder whether you have the right information because certainly they have the highest visibility of officers in the Met. I would like to ask...
  • Step Change and Public Expectations (Supplementary) [12]

    • Question by: Elizabeth Howlett
    • Meeting date: 10 December 2003
    We are not trying to put barriers in the way of Step Change. Like everybody else we think Step Change is an excellent initiative. The barrier is affordability, particularly given the savage cuts the Government has hit all of London's public services with this year. On the issue of affordability, I would like ask two things. Have you had assurance, or even a nod and a wink from Government Ministers, that after next year's pilot which will cost £26.2 million, yes the money would be forthcoming from Government sources? It certainly cannot come from Londoners. As we look forward to...
  • Step Change and Public Expectations (Supplementary) [14]

    • Question by: Graham Tope
    • Meeting date: 10 December 2003
    If Step Change is as successful as we all hope it is, then obviously it will create that sort of public demand and the demand to have it spread. Whilst I might share the aspirations of the Chair that this will persuade whoever is in Government to provide additional resources, if they do not " and I have to say there is no indication that they will at this stage " how can we go ahead to meet those public expectations that we helped to create?
  • Step Change and Public Expectations (Supplementary) [17]

    • Question by: Graham Tope
    • Meeting date: 10 December 2003
    There have been similar initiatives to Step Change in the past which I know the Met acknowledged to have failed. Why do you think they failed in the past? What will be different this time?
  • Double Counting of Salaries

    • Reference: 2002/0236-1
    • Question by: Elizabeth Howlett
    • Meeting date: 13 November 2002
    Why is the cost of the retention of officers following the implementation of C3i being included in the part year cost of additional officers recruited (£48.1m) and being charged to the 2003/4 precept when the salaries of these officers are already in the core budget? Do you agree that without a corresponding negative budget figure in savings that this is double counting? If you do not agree, please clarify the position.
  • CCTV

    • Reference: 2002/0213-1
    • Question by: Graham Tope
    • Meeting date: 13 November 2002
    How effective has CCTV been in reducing crime in the capital? How many convictions have resulted from CCTV cameras on London buses? .