Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 1

Meeting type

Organisation

Question by

Status

Year

  • Regeneration/Environment (Supplementary) [14]

    • Question by: John Biggs
    • Meeting date: 15 October 2003
    But I see this as being possibly an integral and an attractive part of the bid.

  • Regeneration/Environment (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Eric Ollerenshaw
    • Meeting date: 15 October 2003
    So, if I get the terminology right, there has been indicative funding for various projects, which are now not getting indicative funding because it is going to the Olympics. That is how I understand it.

  • Regeneration/Environment (Supplementary) [3]

    • Question by: Eric Ollerenshaw
    • Meeting date: 15 October 2003
    My apologies. Can you explain?

  • Regeneration/Environment (Supplementary) [4]

    • Question by: Eric Ollerenshaw
    • Meeting date: 15 October 2003
    Do you have a figure for the size of the adjustment?

  • Regeneration/Environment (Supplementary) [5]

    • Question by: Eric Ollerenshaw
    • Meeting date: 15 October 2003
    So 25% of your future funding, which would have gone to other communities, has been adjusted to the Olympics?

  • Regeneration/Environment (Supplementary) [6]

    • Question by: Eric Ollerenshaw
    • Meeting date: 15 October 2003
    Yes, and we accept that. In a sense I am being taken around the round-about here, am I not?

  • Regeneration/Environment (Supplementary) [7]

    • Question by: Eric Ollerenshaw
    • Meeting date: 15 October 2003
    We accept totally the case for the Lower Lea Valley and all the rest of it. All we are asking quite simply is what are these `adjustments `and `indicative funding" and all the other terminology and has anything actually been delayed or lost out because this has greater priority. That is all; it is quite simple; there is no need to hide it.

  • Regeneration/Environment (Supplementary) [10]

    • Question by: Eric Ollerenshaw
    • Meeting date: 15 October 2003
    You referred to adjustment in terms of future projects. Does that mean future projects will be delayed?

  • Regeneration/Environment (Supplementary) [12]

    • Question by: Eric Ollerenshaw
    • Meeting date: 15 October 2003

  • Regeneration/Environment (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Mike Tuffrey
    • Meeting date: 15 October 2003
    I am pleased with what you said about the registering of volunteers. I know that New York and some of the continental bids are perhaps a little ahead of us, so it is good to know where we are catching up. I wanted to press you a little harder. At the beginning you talked about getting the balance right between a winning bid and a bid that spreads the benefits around London and so forth. I am optimistic that is not a question of trading one off against the other. You said that part of the winning was about involving...