Search questions

• Reference: 2016/0181
• Question by: John Biggs
• Meeting date: 20 January 2016

How will the proposed LAQM Framework impact on your ability, as Mayor, to tackle air pollution from marine craft and associated infrastructure?

• Reference: 2015/3777
• Question by: John Biggs
• Meeting date: 18 November 2015

How many MPS fleet vehicles will require alteration work following the dieselgate scandal?

• Reference: 2015/3329
• Question by: John Biggs
• Meeting date: 21 October 2015

The Dept. for Business, Innovation and Skills are calling for evidence on how tips, gratuities and service charges are collected and what deductions are made from them by the employer. Given your commitment to the London Living Wage, will you condemn those practices where tips and service charges are used to boost company profits rather than going to the employees providing the service?

• Reference: 2015/2776
• Question by: John Biggs
• Meeting date: 16 September 2015

Do you recognise the inherent injustice where the decision to give the go ahead for the Enderby Wharf Cruise Liner Terminal development - for which you are claiming credit - results in £400,000 for ongoing environmental and improving air quality in one Borough and nothing to support environmental monitoring and air quality development in the immediately neighbouring Borough where they will be equally necessary? How do you explain his failure to take a strategic cross-Borough overview of this application?

• Reference: 2015/2234
• Question by: John Biggs
• Meeting date: 15 July 2015

What progress can you report on the relocation of the allotments and whether the deadlines most recently offered still hold?

• Reference: 2015/1757
• Question by: John Biggs
• Meeting date: 17 June 2015

A total of 22 trees, 3 of them described by TfL as "mature" were removed in order to accommodate the cycle track at this point. What plans to TfL have to replant trees in this area?

• Reference: 2015/1281
• Question by: John Biggs
• Meeting date: 21 May 2015

Following the historic ruling by the Supreme Court on 29th April, what role will London play in the creation of a new national air quality plan?

• Reference: 2015/1282
• Question by: John Biggs
• Meeting date: 21 May 2015

In paragraph 30 of the 29th April Supreme Court judgement it states that "during the five years of breach the prospects of early compliance have become worse, not better". Is this not the clearest demonstration yet that air pollution has got worse under your Mayoralty, not better?

• Reference: 2015/0567
• Question by: John Biggs
• Meeting date: 23 February 2015

The Manor Gardening Society was displaced by the Olympic Games developments, as you know. The replacement site at Eton Manor has been substituted for by making the Marsh Lane temporary relocation site permanent. This partially satisfies the replacement required under the Olympic Planning approvals. The second site, however, at Pudding Mill Lane still needs to be handed over. According to the Planning Permission this was to have happened by December 2014. The two sites are in addition to be 'greater in quality and quantity' than those lost from the old site. I understand that the partially completed site has been...

• Reference: 2015/0128
• Question by: John Biggs
• Meeting date: 21 January 2015

In your answer to 2014/5934 you focus on perceived problems with the governance of the LDA. This is a red herring - as with the LEP a range of stakeholders is required in any such board and the primary decisions will always reside in the Mayor's office. This does however highlight a deficiency with the LEP Board structure. Can you list the members of the London LEP Board, the organisations or 'constituencies' they represent and any 'gaps' you perceive to exist in this membership?