Search questions

• Reference: 2023/4377
• Question by: Sakina Sheikh
• Meeting date: 16 November 2023

What steps can the GLA take to make the public realm more welcoming for girls?

• Reference: 2023/4378
• Question by: Sakina Sheikh
• Meeting date: 16 November 2023

What work has the GLA done to include the views of girls when designing the public realm?

• Reference: 2023/4379
• Question by: Sakina Sheikh
• Meeting date: 16 November 2023

What changes can GLA encourage boroughs to make to existing public spaces such as skate parks and BMX tracks to make them less male-dominated and therefore more friendly to women and girls?

• Reference: 2023/4380
• Question by: Sakina Sheikh
• Meeting date: 16 November 2023

What steps can the GLA take to make parks and open spaces safer for girls?

• Reference: 2023/4385
• Question by: Zack Polanski
• Meeting date: 16 November 2023

Thank you for your answer to my question 2023/3956, in which you said the final delivery reports for the Warmer Homes 3 programme are being compiled. Could you provide more information on when these will be published?

• Reference: 2023/4386
• Question by: Zack Polanski
• Meeting date: 16 November 2023

Thank you for your answer to my question MQ 2023/3956, in which you said the final delivery reports for the Warmer Homes 3 programme are being compiled. When you publish this data, could you also provide a breakdown of how much was spent on a) administration and project management (for both the GLA and RetrofitWorks), b) assessment of homes, c) installation labour, and d) materials for installation?

• Reference: 2023/4387
• Question by: Zack Polanski
• Meeting date: 16 November 2023

Thank you for your answer to my question 2023/3953, in which you said the drop-off in funding for Phase 4 of the Warmer Homes programme was: “due in main to central government stopping the LAD funding stream for households heated by gas.” Could you provide the: a) number, and b) percentage of low-income households in London on the gas grid, which no longer have access to this funding?

• Reference: 2023/4388
• Question by: Zack Polanski
• Meeting date: 16 November 2023

Thank you for your answer to my question 2023/3954, in which you said, “my funding will aim to install retrofit measures on up to 178 low-income households”. In the process of making this forecast, what steps did you take to consider alternative funding mechanisms to the individual grant funding approach, which may have enabled you to upgrade more homes through economies of scale?

• Reference: 2023/4389
• Question by: Zack Polanski
• Meeting date: 16 November 2023

Thank you for your answer to 2023/3954, in which you said you aimed to install 580 homes using HUG2 funding, and 178 homes using GLA funding. What estimates did you make of the anticipated costs to reach these delivery estimates, broken down by a) administration and project management (for both the GLA and RetrofitWorks), b) assessment of homes, c) installation labour, and d) materials for installation?

• Reference: 2023/4390
• Question by: Zack Polanski
• Meeting date: 16 November 2023

Thank you for your answer to my question 2023/3957, in which you said, “as part of the development of a new Retrofit Delivery Model a range of stakeholders will be consulted.” Will you provide a list of which stakeholders the Partnership Board: a) have engaged, and b) plan to engage, during the development of the Retrofit Delivery Model?