Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

  • Taking Responsibility

    • Reference: 2023/3323
    • Question by: Keith Prince
    • Meeting date: 14 September 2023
    As Mayor of London do you accept that, with all matters GLA, the buck stops with you?
  • Concrete safety for GLA group buildings

    • Reference: 2023/3581
    • Question by: Siân Berry
    • Meeting date: 14 September 2023
    The Health and Safety Executive has said that Reinforced Autoclaved Aerated Concrete (RAAC) is now beyond its lifespan and may: “collapse with little or no notice”. Have Transport for London (TfL), London Fire Brigade (LFB) and the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) all assessed their estate to ensure that the buildings they own do not contain any RAAC and, if they have found any related risks, what are they and what actions are being taken?
  • Concrete safety implications for strategic London planning

    • Reference: 2023/3582
    • Question by: Siân Berry
    • Meeting date: 14 September 2023
    The Health and Safety Executive has said that Reinforced Autoclaved Aerated Concrete (RAAC) is now beyond its lifespan and may: “collapse with little or no notice”. What wider assessment have you made of the implications of this problem for resilience and strategic planning in London?
  • Question and Answer Session: Refugees in London (Supplementary) [7]

    • Question by: Siân Berry
    • Meeting date: 07 September 2023
    Siân Berry AM: Thank you very much, Chair. My first question is to Hannah Boylan from the GLA Migration Team. Like my colleague, Caroline [Russell AM], I also met with the Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants, who raised a separate issue about asylum seekers living in Home Office asylum accommodation. The guidance from the Home Office says that category 2 health hazards should be made safe within 24 hours and fixed within five days, but I have heard countless examples of Migrant Help - which Caroline [Russell AM] discussed earlier - failing to respond to complaints and help...
  • Trust

    • Reference: 2022/1204
    • Question by: Keith Prince
    • Meeting date: 24 March 2022
    Should the Government consider you a trustworthy partner?
  • Update on name-anonymous recruitment in the GLA group (1)

    • Reference: 2021/0036
    • Question by: Siân Berry
    • Meeting date: 21 January 2021
    In your answer to my question 2019/14230 you told me that, to date, no recruitment for Transport for London (TfL) had been name-anonymous but you planned future changes to support this. Have these changes now happened and does TfL now use name-anonymous shortlisting in recruitment?
  • Update on name-anonymous recruitment in the GLA group (2)

    • Reference: 2021/0037
    • Question by: Siân Berry
    • Meeting date: 21 January 2021
    Can you confirm whether shortlisting for recruitment in all GLA bodies is now name-anonymous, including recruitment done through partner bodies, outsourced specialist recruitment agencies and for any other work programme, such as apprenticeship schemes run by the GLA and Transport for London (TfL)?
  • Getting London Moving

    • Reference: 2020/2684
    • Question by: Keith Prince
    • Meeting date: 17 September 2020
    Are you doing all that you can to get London moving?
  • Communication with national Government

    • Reference: 2020/2167
    • Question by: Siân Berry
    • Meeting date: 16 July 2020
    On your regular LBC phone-in on 12 June 2020, you said you are no longer attending COBR meetings and were learning what was going on from Government press conferences. Now that these have ceased, how do you hear about changes in policy and guidance from national Government?
  • Thurrock Council Investment

    • Reference: 2020/1717
    • Question by: Keith Prince
    • Meeting date: 18 June 2020
    Are you comfortable with the investment that the GLA has made with Thurrock Council?