Search questions

• Reference: 2016/0982
• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 16 March 2016

In answer to question 2016/0638 you restate what you told me last November, that 'the GLA does not hold information on properties sold through the Right to Buy', and only holds information on replacement homes you have funded. Please explain, therefore, how you were able to state at the January MQT when challenged by me about replacement homes that that 'we have been able to produce a ratio of 3:1 rather than 1:1'?

• Reference: 2016/0983
• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 16 March 2016

In January you told me that you have received Right to Buy underspends by three boroughs. Which boroughs were they, and how much did you receive from each one?

• Reference: 2016/0984
• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 16 March 2016

In answer to question 2016/0637 you told me that the GLA conducts an annual compliance audit of schemes completed under its affordable housing programmes. Have there been any cases where actual rents specified in the tenancy agreement for the home have differed from the rents agreed with the GLA?

• Reference: 2016/0985
• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 16 March 2016

Does the annual compliance audit of schemes completed under its affordable housing programmes take account of the tenure and rent levels entailed in the original section 106 agreements?

• Reference: 2016/0986
• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 16 March 2016

When the GLA considers applications from registered social landlords for affordable housing grants and loans for specific schemes, do officers cross-check the application's details with planning applications, in order to assess whether the RSL is meeting the conditions agreed in the section 106 agreement?

• Reference: 2016/1008
• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 16 March 2016

According to Capital & Counties Properties PLC (Capco) year end results to the London Stock Exchange (audited preliminary results for the year ended 31 December 2015), Capco revealed they are 'monitoring intelligence on activist groups' and have categorised 'public interest or activist group' as a risk to their business. As a public body, should TfL be in partnership with a corporation implying that residents opposing the demolition of their homes, the exhibition industry, local businesses, public figures from both the political and music industry and any parties opposed to the demolition of the Earl's Court exhibition centres should be 'monitored'?

• Reference: 2016/1009
• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 16 March 2016

Will you ask Capital & Counties Properties PLC (Capco), which is working in partnership with TfL on the demolition of Earls Court exhibition centres and the West Kensington and Gibbs Green Housing Estates, to: a) reveal the exact nature of their monitoring activity on 'activist groups' as indicated in Capco's year end results to the London Stock Exchange (audited preliminary results for the year ended 31 December 2015) b) disclose all relevant documents?

• Reference: 2016/1010
• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 16 March 2016

In its Earl's Court collateral agreement with Hammersmith and Fulham, Capital & Counties Properties Plc (Capco) have effectively bound the council to oppose residents of the West Kensington and Gibbs Green estates from transferring ownership of their estates from the Council to a community owned landlord in order to save their homes which are due to be demolished. As Chair of Transport for London are you comfortable with your joint venture partnership with Capco?

• Reference: 2016/1011
• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 16 March 2016

Should developers be allowed to curtail elected councils from representing the best interests of their electorate through the type of collateral agreement the Mayor's joint venture partner Capco has agreed with Hammersmith and Fulham?

• Reference: 2016/0980
• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 16 March 2016

Have you left London's housing situation in a better state than when you first took office in 2008?