Search questions

• Reference: 2024/0170
• Question by: Keith Prince
• Meeting date: 18 January 2024

Residents in Wennington in Havering, whose homes were destroyed in a fire last year, face being charged up to £10,000 in Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) to rebuild their homes, including around £3,000 from the Mayor of London CIL, unless they can commit to living in the home for three years after it is rebuilt. Could you please investigate this and use whatever exemptions are possible, such as discretionary relief, to waive the requirement for Mayoral CIL entirely for these properties, and encourage Havering Council to do the same with their local CIL?

• Reference: 2023/4075
• Question by: Keith Prince
• Meeting date: 16 November 2023

Do you agree with Redbridge Council’s decision to lease part of the Oakfield Playing Fields to a private company, denying access to the public of this long-established piece of Green Belt, which is currently used by upwards of thirty teams a week? Given you intervened last time this piece of Green Belt was under threat, will you use your offices to do so again?

• Reference: 2023/1608
• Question by: Keith Prince
• Meeting date: 18 May 2023

Could you please provide the locations of all of the designated hazardous waste sites in the RM13 area and a breakdown of what types of hazardous waste can be accepted on those sites?

• Reference: 2022/3148
• Question by: Keith Prince
• Meeting date: 15 September 2022

Can you please confirm where the waste from the Olympic site in Stratford was transported to and was any of it taken to Arnolds Field, in Launders Lane, Rainham Essex.

• Question by: Keith Prince
• Meeting date: 01 July 2021

Keith Prince AM (Deputy Chairman): Good afternoon, Deputy Mayor. Thank you very much for coming down and visiting the SHC [Partnership] unit at Westminster Abbey yesterday. I am sorry I could not be there. I was at a Transport Committee meeting. You visited the unit, you went into it and you will probably tell me what you felt about it. One of the issues we had is because it is designed to fit on the back of a low loader without a police escort, it does fall just shy of the Mayor’s space standards. This does not seem to be...

• Reference: 2021/2362
• Question by: Keith Prince
• Meeting date: 24 June 2021

Is your ‘No Night Out’ promise being met?

• Reference: 2021/1181
• Question by: Navin Shah
• Meeting date: 18 March 2021

The Assembly found that waking watches are costing Londoners £16,000 an hour. Can explain why is it so expensive to run these ‘watches’ in London? What actions are you taking to ensure that these watches continue and what else are you doing to support Londoners living in unsafe environments due to dangerous cladding?

• Reference: 2021/0961
• Question by: Navin Shah
• Meeting date: 25 February 2021

In recent years the StreetLink app has been very useful so that members of the public could identify rough sleepers and make StreetLink aware of them. Now there is much less footfall on London’s streets as people stay home, what is being done to ensure as many rough sleepers as possible are being located and helped, especially as the cold weather continues to take its toll?

• Reference: 2021/0962
• Question by: Navin Shah
• Meeting date: 25 February 2021

I’m pleased that after a long and unacceptable delay the London Plan can now shape and make a positive contribution to London. As London paves its way to recovery, will the London Plan need modifications in the light of the pandemic which has brought about radical changes in the way we live and work etc. Is the London Plan robust and flexible enough to absorb major changes required to pave a way to recovery or will it need to change? If latter is the case how do you think it can and will be done?

• Reference: 2021/0382
• Question by: Navin Shah
• Meeting date: 21 January 2021

The Secretary of State seems to have directed more control to local authorities over the definition, location and height of tall buildings based on the authority’s own policies. How does this allow ‘strategic’ control of tall buildings across London to ensure that they are not detrimental in respect of their location, height, quality of design and overall built/environmental impact on London?