Search questions

• Reference: 2016/0110
• Question by: Stephen Knight
• Meeting date: 20 January 2016

Further to your answer to MQ2015/4316, can you provide a table listing the number of occasions that the water cannon purchased by the Met have been used for training or exercise purposes.

• Reference: 2016/0111
• Question by: Stephen Knight
• Meeting date: 20 January 2016

Please explain why MOPAC/MPS quarterly monitoring reports no longer provide details of any savings in technology running costs?

• Reference: 2015/4316
• Question by: Stephen Knight
• Meeting date: 16 December 2015

Given you have no plans to sell the water cannon purchased last year (MQ2015/3620) can you confirm that they will become part of the Metropolitan Police Service's historical collection? Do you agree with me that their public display could serve a useful educational purpose by prompting discussion about the principles of policing by consent?

• Reference: 2015/4317
• Question by: Stephen Knight
• Meeting date: 16 December 2015

What if any discussions did your Deputy Mayor for Policing and Crime have with those currently managing the historic collections of the London Fire Brigade and London Ambulance Service before deciding to establish a permanent home for the Metropolitan Police Service's collection alone? Given your previous support for a single 'blue light' museum (MQ2012/0483) will you re-examine the case for bringing together the historic collections of the Metropolitan Police Service, London Fire Brigade and London Ambulance Service?

• Reference: 2015/2145
• Question by: Stephen Knight
• Meeting date: 15 July 2015

Which aspects of the criminal justice system in London did you discuss with the Secretary of State for Justice on 15 June 2015? Was devolution one of the areas?

• Reference: 2015/1133
• Question by: Stephen Knight
• Meeting date: 25 March 2015

How many homes have been confiscated, and how many have had their ownership investigated by the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) Proceeds of Corruption Unit (POCU) since 2008? Please provide a breakdown by year, including the total value of assets under investigation if known.

• Reference: 2015/0079
• Question by: Stephen Knight
• Meeting date: 21 January 2015

Further to your partial answer to MQ2014/5108, can we assume that your Deputy Mayor's decision to halt the planned sale of properties in Raynesfield, Merton was only communicated to Crown Housing Ltd (now Crown Simmons Ltd) on 28 November 2014?

• Reference: 2015/0080
• Question by: Stephen Knight
• Meeting date: 21 January 2015

In answer to MQ2014/5109, you stated that any compensation offered to tenants who suffered financially as a result of the attempted disposal of MOPAC-owned properties in Raynesfield would be a matter for Crown Simmons Ltd to consider as landlord. However, it is clear that many of the substantial (and unnecessary) moving and storage costs incurred by residents could have been avoided if your Deputy Mayor's decision to halt eviction proceedings had been taken and communicated earlier in the process. Given MOPAC's direct responsibility for this situation, is it not right that you now consider offering compensation?

• Reference: 2014/5087
• Question by: Stephen Knight
• Meeting date: 17 December 2014

Will you lobby the Home Office to ensure that there is no cut to the already overstretched grant funding for the Royal Parks OCU?

• Reference: 2014/5108
• Question by: Stephen Knight
• Meeting date: 17 December 2014

Further to the welcome (if overdue) recognition by your Deputy Mayor for Policing and Crime of the social value of continuing to provide affordable housing for low-paid public service workers, can you confirm at what point the Mayor's Office for Policing and Crime (MOPAC) decided to cancel the planned eviction of residents living in its properties in Merton? Please confirm when this decision was communicated to Crown Housing Association which leases these homes on behalf of the MOPAC?