Search questions

• Reference: 2024/0930
• Question by: Hina Bokhari
• Meeting date: 15 March 2024

Re my question 2024/0527: You state: 'The Silvertown Tunnel scheme, including the user charge and new zero emission bus network, has been designed to ensure that there is no material impact in the number of vehicle trips across the river.' Can you please confirm that this is in fact incorrect, and that opening the Silvertown Tunnel, whether or not it is tolled, and whether or not zero emission buses are used, always substantially increases cross-river traffic, and local pollution, and carbon emissions, compared to an otherwise identical situation in which Silvertown is not opened to general traffic?

• Reference: 2024/0853
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 15 March 2024

How many Level One incidents have been recorded by the TfL Operations Network Management Control Centre on the A23 Streatham High Road SW16 attributed to or exacerbated by the Streatham Wells Low Traffic Neighbourhood in each of the following months to date: July 2023 August 2023 September 2023 October 2023 November 2023 December 2023 January 2024 February 2024

• Reference: 2024/0925
• Question by: Hina Bokhari
• Meeting date: 15 March 2024

The proposed toll on Blackwall and opening the Silvertown Tunnel to general traffic (with or without a toll) are two separate schemes that can be implemented either independently or together. Given the urgency of action on climate and air pollution it is therefore vital for us to understand how each scheme contributes independently to air pollution and climate targets, as well as how they might work together i) Can you provide (in tonnes/year) the reduction in CO2 emissions and PM and NOX pollution that will be achieved by tolling the Blackwall tunnel to effectively relieve regular congestion on the tunnel...

• Reference: 2024/0927
• Question by: Hina Bokhari
• Meeting date: 15 March 2024

Re my question: 2024/0525: The proposed toll on Blackwall and opening the Silvertown Tunnel to general traffic (with or without a toll) are two separate schemes that can be implemented either independently or together - and, given the legal structure of the project, future London Mayors will have a choice of whether to implement either or both. It is therefore important to understand the disaggregated economic consequences of these choices. Can you therefore use the same methodology you have used to calculate the benefits of both schemes together to also calculate: i) The economic benefit of just tolling Blackwall to...

• Reference: 2024/0447
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 22 February 2024

What specific actions have been taken during the month of January 2024 by (a) TfL and (b) Camden Council in relation to making Holborn Gyratory safe for cyclists?

• Reference: 2024/0448
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 22 February 2024

Can you please publish the meeting notes for the meeting held on 4th October 2023 with senior taxi representatives?

• Reference: 2024/0449
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 22 February 2024

Can you please provide the Taxi and Private Hire Financial Summary for 2020/2021, 2021/2022 and 2022/2023?

• Reference: 2024/0450
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 22 February 2024

Transport for London has a policy to add a 6 month punishment on top of a driving disqualification imposed by the courts for taxi or private hire drivers for amassing 12 penalty points from the totting-up procedure. In cases where the courts allow a taxi or private hire driver to keep their driving licence, I understand that it is TfL’s policy to ignore successful court pleadings of hardship and keep in place the additional civil punishment, meaning they still revoke the taxi or private hire licence. Will you ask TfL to consider alternative options such as introducing 6-month probationary licences...

• Reference: 2024/0451
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 22 February 2024

Back in 2016, this site was identified as a site that could deliver 120 new homes. The current plan provides for about 35 one-to three-bed homes. Is this really the best outcome and do you think this is good enough?

• Reference: 2024/0452
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 22 February 2024

This development site also includes a key “Archaeology Priority Zone” with some of the largest Roman architectural remains found in London. Residents have raised concerns that TfL and its partners have evaded the “Retain in Situ” obligations. Are you confident that TfL and its property company have appropriately managed the archaeology, heritage and the cultural value of this site?