Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

  • Leveson Inquiry

    • Reference: 2012/0068-2
    • Question by: Joanne McCartney
    • Meeting date: 20 December 2012
    Does the Metropolitan Police Service actually accept in broad principle the findings of the Leveson Inquiry?
  • Leveson Inquiry (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Joanne McCartney
    • Meeting date: 20 December 2012
    Obviously because the time has slipped for getting bids in to you by the end of February but the schemes are going to be starting in April, the new financial year, it does not give them very much leeway. Will you be giving them some extra leeway in how they can deliver those schemes?
  • Leveson Inquiry (Supplementary) [4]

    • Question by: Fiona Twycross
    • Meeting date: 20 December 2012
    I am going to move on to a few questions about community safety funding, if I may, and I wanted to ask the Deputy Mayor for Policing and Crime. Obviously we have seen some of the criteria that have come through in the letter that has been sent out from you and London Councils to councils. The first question was how MOPAC selected the criteria under which the decisions on allocating community safety funding were selected and what consultation if any you made in determining the criteria with relevant stakeholders who were applying for funding.
  • Leveson Inquiry (Supplementary) [5]

    • Question by: Len Duvall OBE
    • Meeting date: 20 December 2012
    There are the Leveson recommendations and then there are things that the police can do over and above Leveson themselves. If we go to the heart of the issues of investigating the rich and powerful, the checks and balances on judgement calls. From the original investigation of limiting to the few - not going in and looking at the wider evidence but it sits there in a room or whatever - to other issues of when you do the recall are the checks and balances internally and judgement calls about investigating issues. Is there something more that the police can...
  • Leveson Inquiry (Supplementary) [6]

    • Question by: Len Duvall OBE
    • Meeting date: 20 December 2012
    Can we look at the MOPAC role now? My question is directly to Stephen. There are two questions and thank you. I think you have provided the Committee with some correspondence from the previous questions around this issue. Can you just explain to us how the MOPAC plans to oversee the Metropolitan Police Service implementation of the Leveson recommendations will work? I understand there was an Audit Committee yesterday. Can you also then demonstrate how yours and the Mayor's relationships with the press will be transparent? That was an item that I think you alluded to in the correspondence that...
  • Leveson Inquiry (Supplementary) [7]

    • Question by: John Biggs
    • Meeting date: 20 December 2012
    With your indulgence, Chair, I wanted to cover two things briefly. The first I think is to Stephen Greenhalgh, which is that he is the lineal successor to [Lord] Toby Harris AM, Len Duvall AM [former Chairs of the MPA and then Kit Malthouse AM [former Deputy Mayor for Policing and Crime]. They exercised their roles predominantly as chairs of the MPA with many members. I just wanted to, if you like, punch the bruise of Tony Arbour's question, which is that understanding and defining your role -- and you are not stupid by any stretch of the imagination. However...
  • Leveson Inquiry (Supplementary) [8]

    • Question by: Murad Qureshi
    • Meeting date: 20 December 2012
    Can I ask the Deputy Commissioner for a point of clarification on the Leveson recommendations? To what extent are they applicable to British publications getting hacked material from abroad?
  • Drug Intervention Programme (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Len Duvall OBE
    • Meeting date: 20 December 2012
    I just want to clarify a bit on that transparency process, and it goes a bit back to some earlier answers you gave on the future of community safety funding plus the DIP money. OK, not all of it, but some of it is MOPAC's money and I think in your desire for joint commissioning, is it joint decision-making or is the ultimate decision going to be with MOPAC or with the London Crime Reduction Board? What is the line of accountability? Is it ultimately advisory to you, you sign it off, or are you going to share that decision...
  • Drug Intervention Programme (Supplementary) [3]

    • Question by: Joanne McCartney
    • Meeting date: 20 December 2012
    Can I just ask one question before we leave this section on violence against women and girls. We did hear in one of our earlier sessions that there is a shortage of refuge places in London. Is that something that MOPAC can look at, the demand and the need for that as well?
  • Project Daedalus (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Len Duvall OBE
    • Meeting date: 20 December 2012
    Can we move away from the preplanned operations and some of the specialist operations, and talk to what is available in boroughs in terms of response? Just to get to the bottom of two cars, four officers being added and TSG group already in existence, could you just explain to me, would they only be available to certain boroughs in terms of tasking? Do they get round to all boroughs? They do not stay in one particular borough. I presume on top of that there are existing roving armed response vehicles that are Taser-led, so they could respond to a...