Search questions

• Reference: 2000/0432
• Question by: Bob Neill
• Meeting date: 20 December 2000

With regard to your Business Advisory Forum, please would you set out the A) Membership; and B) Terms of Reference and advise on A) How many times it has met; and B) What the Forum has discussed so far? .

• Reference: 2000/0470
• Question by: Bob Neill
• Meeting date: 20 December 2000

a) what will be the increase in precept anticipated to result from the Mayor's budget proposals announced so far; b) what account did the Mayor take of council tax subsidy limitation penalties in costing his proposals?

• Reference: 2000/0471
• Question by: Bob Neill
• Meeting date: 20 December 2000

Is the Mayor satisfied with discussions with the government concerning PPP, and will he update the Assembly on progress and decisions made to date?

• Reference: 2000/0472
• Question by: Bob Neill
• Meeting date: 20 December 2000

In relation to the Mayor's decision formally to object to liquor license applications at the proposed Crystal Palace development, will he a) disclose the legal advice upon which he based his decision; and b) state the costs incurred by the GLA in pursuance of this objection, including all legal costs and dispursement and staff time expended?

• Reference: 2000/0473
• Question by: Bob Neill
• Meeting date: 20 December 2000

Have the government yet released to the Mayor the data underlying the new Indices of Multiple Deprivation, and if not, what action does he propose to take to ensure that London is not disadvantaged in the allocation of Neighbourhood Renewal Fund monies? .

• Reference: 2000/0361
• Question by: Bob Neill
• Meeting date: 15 November 2000

Will the Mayor a) undertake a detailed survey into the costs and adequacy of accommodation at alternative buildings to the proposed ones at More London Bridge? and b) specifically seek the views of the London Assembly, before entering into any binding agreement to take over the lease of the More London Bridge premises? .

• Reference: 2000/0362
• Question by: Bob Neill
• Meeting date: 15 November 2000

Will the Mayor a) Confirm that TfL has invited tenders for a contract to provide services for the management of consultation and managing communications in relation to the proposed congestion charge scheme b) State if a contract has been awarded, and if so: (i) to whom (ii) for what period (iii) at what cost to TfL and/or the GLA (iv) for precisely what services and why c) If a contract has been awarded (i) precisely what service is it anticipated will be provided and why (ii) the anticipated length of the contract (iii) what sum has been suggested to cover...

• Reference: 2000/0379
• Question by: Bob Neill
• Meeting date: 15 November 2000

Who are the Members of the River Thames Steering Group, established by the Mayor, and what are its terms of reference?

• Reference: 2000/0269
• Question by: Bob Neill
• Meeting date: 18 October 2000

Following the Mayor's replies on this topic on 13 September, having now seen the report of the consultants W S Atkins, and in particular their conclusion on the relative merits of a DLR or heavy rail crossing at Woolwich, namely that the heavy rail option overall "provides greater regeneration benefits, a wider spread of transport planning benefits and more residual service development potential", will the Mayor now firmly incorporate this option into his package of river crossing proposals?

• Reference: 2000/0319
• Question by: Bob Neill
• Meeting date: 18 October 2000

In light of the appointment of a high-powered Transport Commissioner for London, what need is there now for the full-time, salaried, Vice-chair of Transport for London? .