Search questions

• Reference: 2000/0411
• Question by: Eric Ollerenshaw
• Meeting date: 20 December 2000

What has he learned from the fiasco of this year's abortive New Year's Eve Plans and can he now explain the plans he has for the traditional midnight gathering in Trafalgar Square and the concomitant legal and financial details?

• Reference: 2000/0431
• Question by: Lynne Featherstone
• Meeting date: 20 December 2000

Why has the Mayor refused to set targets for improvements to public transport in his response to the Assembly's Congestion Charging Scrutiny?

• Reference: 2000/0462
• Question by: Lynne Featherstone
• Meeting date: 20 December 2000

Why has the Mayor refused to set targets for improvements to public transport in his response to the Assembly's Congestion Charging Scrutiny?

• Reference: 2000/0454
• Question by: Eric Ollerenshaw
• Meeting date: 20 December 2000

The Mayor will be aware that his unpaid Cabinet advisor on urban strategy, Lord Rogers, is in addition a paid consultant to the Greater London Authority on urban task force principles. Does the Mayor think that this reresents a conflict of interests? .

• Reference: 2000/0463
• Question by: Lynne Featherstone
• Meeting date: 20 December 2000

Will the Mayor treat the Assembly's comments on his draft Transport Strategy more seriously than he did those on Congestion Charging? .

• Reference: 2000/0339
• Question by: Eric Ollerenshaw
• Meeting date: 15 November 2000

Is the Mayor satisfied that the organisational and financial preparations for the New Year's Eve 2000 party, which he is responsible for, have been successful and fully transparent?

• Reference: 2000/0396
• Question by: Lynne Featherstone
• Meeting date: 15 November 2000

What are the implications for the repairs and maintenance needed to the Underground now as well as after its handing over to TfL arising from the Deputy Prime Minister's refusal to disclose information to the Mayor and Robert Kiley on the basis that everything related to the PPP is automatically confidential for commercial reasons? .

• Reference: 2000/0343
• Question by: Lynne Featherstone
• Meeting date: 15 November 2000

Given the sorry state of the tube, with signal failures, escalator breakdown's, overcrowding, station closures and so on, does the Mayor believe that a target of halving equipment failures over 8 years is good enough?

• Reference: 2000/0344
• Question by: Lynne Featherstone
• Meeting date: 15 November 2000

Is the Mayor happy with the proposal to reduce public transport on New Year's Eve?

• Reference: 2000/0345
• Question by: Lynne Featherstone
• Meeting date: 15 November 2000

Given that the Hutton report, Bob Kiley and London tube users all appear to feel that safety will be compromised if the Government's proposed PPP for the tube goes ahead, can the Mayor think of any olive branch which might help the government climb down but save face, given that there appears to be no reason for their stance other than dogma and saving face?