Search questions

• Reference: 2003/2373
• Question by: Lynne Featherstone
• Meeting date: 17 December 2003

What were the costs to the Public Cab Office of the Transport Research Laboratory review of the Conditions of Fitness for London black cabs? What were their legal costs in unsuccessfully trying to resist demands for the TRL review to be made public? .

• Reference: 2003/0463-1
• Question by: Lynne Featherstone
• Meeting date: 10 December 2003

What progress has been made in making police services in London more accessible? " .

• Reference: 2003/0465-1
• Question by: Lynne Featherstone
• Meeting date: 10 December 2003

Have there been any problems with the introduction of PCSOs? If so, what changes if any will be made to their role? What has the public reaction been? .

• Reference: 2003/0468-1
• Question by: Lynne Featherstone
• Meeting date: 10 December 2003

What progress has been made in setting up an inquiry into the handling of internal investigations and grievances within the Metropolitan Police Service? .

• Reference: 2003/2093
• Question by: Lynne Featherstone
• Meeting date: 19 November 2003

Why are you proceeding with the consultation on an extension to the congestion charging scheme before we know the full impacts, social, economic and financial - on the existing scheme? .

• Reference: 2003/2074
• Question by: Lynne Featherstone
• Meeting date: 19 November 2003

In your Mayor's Report you state; At my press conference on 21 October I indicated my intention to go to consultation over West London Tram in early spring 2004 if possible - before the Mayoral election. I have been encouraged by the positive response the proposed scheme has had amongst local residents and businesses and the urgent need to address the problem of rapidly increasing congestion in this area. Please provide a breakdown of the number of positive and negative responses you have received for each constituency along the proposed route, divided into business / residents. .

• Reference: 2003/2083
• Question by: Lynne Featherstone
• Meeting date: 19 November 2003

For passengers who use the Oystercard for occasional travel, a £3 refundable deposit charge could be a barrier to obtaining the Oystercard for people on low incomes, and these people would then pay the 'premium' cash fares. Is this fair? .

• Reference: 2003/2084
• Question by: Lynne Featherstone
• Meeting date: 19 November 2003

Given that it is now obligatory when purchasing a season ticket from London Underground Limited to purchase an Oyster card, why are purchasers not informed that specific information about their recent journeys can be displayed on screens with Oyster card readers in Tube stations? How does the registration and purchase documentation obtain the consent of purchasers to use their personal information in this manner? For what purpose is this information: a) collected; and b) further processed? To whom is this information disclosed and why? Please set out the technical and administrative security measures that LUL put in place prior to...

• Reference: 2003/2094
• Question by: Lynne Featherstone
• Meeting date: 19 November 2003

Is the Mayor now any further on since our last meeting in being able to assure London that the tube's good safety record is not deteriorating in the wake of the two recent accidents? .

• Reference: 2003/2134
• Question by: Lynne Featherstone
• Meeting date: 19 November 2003

Do you agree with Jay Walder, Head of Finance at Transport for London, and with the Liberal Democrats, that we should be moving to road charging across the whole of Greater London, using global positioning satellite technology ? .