Search questions

• Reference: 2004/0300-1
• Question by: Jenny Jones
• Meeting date: 13 October 2004

Would additional park and ride facilities be established on the fringes of London for the Olympics? If so, where would they be?

• Reference: 2004/0302-1
• Question by: Jenny Jones
• Meeting date: 13 October 2004

What arrangements will be made to accommodate the football clubs which use East Marsh when they are displaced for parking for the Olympics? Why have you not considered closing roads for temporary coach parking, instead of using green space?

• Reference: 2004/1107
• Question by: Jenny Jones
• Meeting date: 15 September 2004

Do you agree that is disgraceful for Thames Water's parent company to cream off profits of some £500m whilst neglecting to address major environmental issues, including sewage discharges into the Thames and massive water leakage? Who is responsible for the lack of investment funding: Thames Water, OFWAT or the government?

• Reference: 2004/1159
• Question by: Jenny Jones
• Meeting date: 15 September 2004

In view of the appalling casualty record for cyclists in the City of London, would you please urge the City to take the offered TfL funding and implement a 20mph zone in the Square Mile?

• Reference: 2004/1192
• Question by: Jenny Jones
• Meeting date: 15 September 2004

Do you agree that Crossrail should not refer to its proposed site at the Romford Maintenance Depot as brown-field , as they will have to use a substantial area of greenbelt land in order to gain access to the depot? With the Government's initiative to keep sports playing fields safe from development and with Havering losing at least 4 venues in recent years to housing and other major developments, is it justifiable to deprive local children the Westlands Playing Fields? Especially as the Westlands were originally eliminated from Crossrail's plans due to environmental impact and conflicts with planning policy

• Reference: 2004/1193
• Question by: Jenny Jones
• Meeting date: 15 September 2004

Are you aware that Crossrail want to use around two fifths of an area called the Westlands Rough for the Romford Depot? This area is classified as a Site of Importance for Nature Conservation and is an oasis of plants, animals and insects that is of great importance and interest to local residents and children?

• Reference: 2004/1194
• Question by: Jenny Jones
• Meeting date: 15 September 2004

As some of the proposed depot land is prone to standing water during long periods of rain, giving rise to the thought that the water table is rising in the area, does the GLA or Crossrail plan to carry out ecological and flood hazard surveys of the Westlands site?

• Reference: 2004/1195
• Question by: Jenny Jones
• Meeting date: 15 September 2004

Using Crossrails own selection process and reasons for elimination, Romford Gas Works site GE14 and Romford Goods Yard GE15 were both originally eliminated as individual sites for reasons of safety. How can it therefore be acceptable when both sites are combined and they become the preferred site?

• Reference: 2004/1196
• Question by: Jenny Jones
• Meeting date: 15 September 2004

What plans do Crossrail have to mitigate the impacts of all the construction traffic travelling the six miles from the M25 to the Romford depot site, as this traffic will have to travel through areas of the town that are already heavily congested with local traffic?

• Reference: 2004/1018
• Question by: Jenny Jones
• Meeting date: 15 September 2004

Apart from voluntary agreements what action can the GLA and TfL take to ensure that skip and tipper lorries in London have side impact bars? For example, have you considered making it a condition of any large developments planning consent that all lorries involved in it construction and future servicing have such side impact bars?