Search questions

• Reference: 2005/2438
• Question by: Angie Bray
• Meeting date: 14 December 2005

Further to the answer you gave to question 2195 / 2005 how much money has so far been raised for Mothers Against Guns and the Princes Trust by 'Why'? Can you break this down the total turnover into: revenue from screening the video, revenue for radio airplay and revenue from EP sales?

• Reference: 2005/2440
• Question by: Angie Bray
• Meeting date: 14 December 2005

What are the practical implications of the clean venue requirements on 'The O2' as previously mentioned in Mayoral Question 2198 / 2005? Specifically can you confirm that the venue will not have to adopt a temporary name during the 2012 Games? Was this matter discussed when you met Philip Anschutz on 2nd November 2005?

• Reference: 2005/2397
• Question by: Angie Bray
• Meeting date: 14 December 2005

You may recall my earlier question (14 September MQT) regarding the noise and disturbance caused to local residents by the announcement system at Earl's Court Station. Following a meeting between myself, the GLA Head of Transport, a representative of local residents, London Underground, Environmental Health Officers and a local Councillor, it was understood and agreed that the Station Manager would instruct staff that announcements were to be strictly monitored and only those relating to Health and Safety issues were to be relayed over the PA system outside the hours of 9pm and 7.30am. It was also agreed that the matter...

• Reference: 2005/2404
• Question by: Angie Bray
• Meeting date: 14 December 2005

I have been in correspondence with Transport for London for some months now concerning the noise and vibration caused by Volvo buses using Chepstow Road, W2. Transport for London has assured me that the faults on the exhausts of these buses have been eradicated, and that they are in discussion with Volvo to ensure that the problem does not reoccur in the future. Unfortunately, it would seem that the problem has not been solved, as I am still receiving complaints that the noise and vibration caused by the buses is excessive. Engineers who tested the buses originally found that the...

• Reference: 2005/2405
• Question by: Angie Bray
• Meeting date: 14 December 2005

Are you aware that Labour Hammersmith and Fulham Council has come out and opposed the Congestion Charge Western Extension? Can you think why this might be? Could it be that they are worried about how electorally unpopular the policy is?

• Reference: 2005/2407
• Question by: Angie Bray
• Meeting date: 14 December 2005

Does the Mayor believe that the decision to reject the plans for the Olympic aquatic centre is just the tip of a potential iceberg in relation to additional costs to the construction of the Olympic village?

• Reference: 2005/2408
• Question by: Angie Bray
• Meeting date: 14 December 2005

Does he agree with the secretary of state for CMS, that those involved in delivering the Games must be "absolutely ruthless in ensuring that any potential overspend, no matter how small, is caught early and driven down"?

• Reference: 2005/2439
• Question by: Angie Bray
• Meeting date: 14 December 2005

Further to the answer you gave to question 2197 / 2005 why are London Televisions profits, or indeed losses, commercially sensitive? I was given to understand that London TV was a public body funded by the taxpayer.

• Reference: 2005/2447
• Question by: Angie Bray
• Meeting date: 14 December 2005

The British government won a number of valuable concessions regarding the EU Directive implementing The Artist' Resale Right in the UK for the first time. Will you ensure through London House, Brussels, that London lobby's to protect those concessions in the lead up to the directive's review in 2009?

• Reference: 2005/2448
• Question by: Angie Bray
• Meeting date: 14 December 2005

An important protection limiting any possible damage to competitiveness of the London Art Market was the UK's derogation against the Droit de Suite applying to deceased artist's work. Will you attempt to lobby our own government and other member states to ensure that the derogation is kept in place until the Droit de Suite is adopted by all our competitor markets such as New York and Geneva?