Search questions

• Reference: 2007/2070
• Question by: Andrew Pelling
• Meeting date: 12 September 2007

What can be done to ensure that there can be medium term financial support for business development and successful managers reaching out to employers and the workless in London?

• Reference: 2007/2071
• Question by: Andrew Pelling
• Meeting date: 12 September 2007

How can the capital assets of FE be used more effectively to get employers to train in London?

• Reference: 2007/2072
• Question by: Andrew Pelling
• Meeting date: 12 September 2007

How can TraintoGain be given be a wider remit to reach out to the workless in London?

• Reference: 2007/2073
• Question by: Andrew Pelling
• Meeting date: 12 September 2007

What is being done to support the good work of traininglondon.net?

• Reference: 2007/2041
• Question by: Andrew Pelling
• Meeting date: 12 September 2007

Would you concede that bus services in the south eastern part of New Addington would be improved if the 464 bus was linked to the tram with through ticketing?

• Reference: 2007/1722
• Question by: Andrew Pelling
• Meeting date: 18 July 2007

How is the amount spent on TfL consultants in 2006-07 broken down by Group Directorates, London Buses, DLR, LU and London Rail? How does this compare to 2005-06?

• Reference: 2007/1723
• Question by: Andrew Pelling
• Meeting date: 18 July 2007

The end of year TfL monitoring report for 2006-07 operating expenditure on consultants at £165m. What was the other £45m spent on to reach the overall consultancy expenditure?

• Reference: 2007/1724
• Question by: Andrew Pelling
• Meeting date: 18 July 2007

If TfL alone spent £210m on consultants in 2006-07, what did the other Functional Bodies spend on consultants and how is this broken down into their relevant area types e.g. management consultancy, project management, PR?

• Reference: 2007/1725
• Question by: Andrew Pelling
• Meeting date: 18 July 2007

How much did you spend on legal fees over the recent LFEPA nominations argument? What legal advice was you given on the issue both before and after your actions?

• Reference: 2007/1726
• Question by: Andrew Pelling
• Meeting date: 18 July 2007

Further to your answers to MQT 1304 and 1306, considering that 95% of the land required for the Olympic Park is now within public sector control and 400 of the 450 units at Clays Lane are vacant why are the acquisition costs only at 50% so far with another £557m still to be spent?