Search questions

• Reference: 2013/4052
• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 20 November 2013

Can you provide a breakdown by year of the number of pedestrians killed or suffering a 'major injury', as a result of a collision with a bus in 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012?

• Reference: 2013/4053
• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 20 November 2013

Cyclists have suggested that TfL's chosen design for Cobden Junction compares unfavourably with the existing junction when judged by TfL's 'Level of Service Assessment' criteria and that the London Borough of Camden's preferred option scored more favourably than TfL's chosen design. In order that cyclists can better understand how TfL took the decision it did, will TfL publish the scores given to each of the factors it judged and the rationale for doing so?

• Reference: 2013/4067
• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 20 November 2013

Can you please clarify how much is due to be spent on making dangerous junctions safer, in each year between now and 2015/16?

• Reference: 2013/4068
• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 20 November 2013

Given that TfL has underspent on the cycling budget for at least the last six years, sometimes by over 40%, how much do you intend to over program in order to ensure that all of your cycling budget gets spent?

• Reference: 2013/4069
• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 20 November 2013

Thank you for your answer to my Transport for London question 30/2013 where you state that "The design for Cobden Junction not to preclude a west to east route (the project leaves this space clear to make any future implementation as easy and cost effective as possible)." Rather than implement another second rate cycling safety scheme that can be fixed at a later date, why don't you do it right first time?

• Reference: 2013/4070
• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 20 November 2013

Why is your redesign of Tottenham Hale falling well short of 'Go Dutch' standards of cyclist safety? Rather than implement another second rate cycling safety scheme that will have to be fixed at a later date, why don't you do it right first time?

• Reference: 2013/4071
• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 20 November 2013

Why are you proposing to divert CS5 onto Belgrave Road because the direct route would involve cycle lanes which "remove some general traffic space on Vauxhall Bridge Road"? Your cycling adviser says Belgrave Road has advantages because it is "fairly quiet, we wouldn't need to make any changes to the road, apart from intermittent markings." Rather than implement another second rate cycling safety scheme that will have to be fixed at a later date, why don't you do it right first time?

• Reference: 2013/4044
• Question by: Jenny Jones
• Meeting date: 20 November 2013

Are you satisfied with the uptake of the Green Deal in London?

• Reference: 2013/4045
• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 20 November 2013

Further to my question 2013/0815, Lambeth Council - the so-called co-operative council - has continued proceedings to evict residents of housing co-operatives and supported housing. This will lead to a loss of affordable and supported housing in the borough, undermining the objectives of your housing strategy to empower tenants and to increase the provision of affordable and supported housing. Given this, do you agree that this is an unacceptable way for the council to raise funds, and will you urge them to work with tenants in line with your housing strategy?

• Reference: 2013/4072
• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 20 November 2013

Thank you for your answer to my Transport for London question 32/2013 and 33/2013 regarding improvements made to junctions. Apart from the work at Waterloo Roundabout and the installation of ASL's and Trixie Mirrors, what other junctions have been improved outside of the cycling superhighways program?