Search questions

• Reference: 2013/4814
• Question by: Navin Shah
• Meeting date: 18 December 2013

To assist funding of step-free access and other improvements for this vital transport hub (a key to longstanding regeneration of Harrow) should TfL not be looking at alternative ways of finding new funding streams like re-developing the existing bus station with a mixed use scheme (e.g. a bus garage with residential / offices above)? Don't you agree that there are other TfL properties / land adjacent the station that could and should also be given development consideration? Also, can you please advise me if any such viability is being undertaken?

• Reference: 2013/4815
• Question by: Navin Shah
• Meeting date: 18 December 2013

What recent representations have been made recently from Harrow to you, Sir Edward Lister and TfL about the accessibility and town centre regeneration issues related to this station?

• Reference: 2013/4816
• Question by: Navin Shah
• Meeting date: 18 December 2013

My constituents in Harrow, local residents, stakeholders (including a leading local disability group) and I totally reject TfL's and your contention that Stanmore Station is accessible. A constituent has complained to me that she wrote to you on 29th February and has still yet to receive a reply to her letter. Don't you think that this is discourteous and outright negligent behaviour? Can you promise to write to the constituent concerned and apologise?

• Reference: 2013/4817
• Question by: Navin Shah
• Meeting date: 18 December 2013

Whilst an opportunity was missed to re-configure the arrangements to provide a well-designed fit for purpose station for step-free access when the new platform was added to the station. Don't you think it's high time that a suitable lift access is provided for commuters plus those travelling to the world most famous RNOH and ASPIR?

• Reference: 2013/4818
• Question by: Navin Shah
• Meeting date: 18 December 2013

Prior to the elections in 2008, you made a pledge outside North Harrow Tube station to keep ticket offices open and to keep stations safe etc. I am deeply disappointed to hear that every ticket office on the Tube is to be shut by 2015 under your plans that will see 750 jobs cut. Will the staff cuts not adversely impact on passenger service including risk to the vulnerable and raise serious issues of safety and security?

• Reference: 2013/4819
• Question by: Navin Shah
• Meeting date: 18 December 2013

You have announced London Underground will run weekend services 24 hours on the Piccadilly, Victoria, Central, Jubilee and Northern lines. Would you not require more staff to run a more efficient and safe service for those longer hours?

• Reference: 2013/4820
• Question by: Navin Shah
• Meeting date: 18 December 2013

How many more staff would you be deploying at those 24 hour stations?

• Reference: 2013/4821
• Question by: Navin Shah
• Meeting date: 18 December 2013

Why is the Bakerloo Line not included in the 24hr weekend service?

• Reference: 2013/4826
• Question by: Navin Shah
• Meeting date: 18 December 2013

I refer to your recent announcement via a London newspaper proposing a Super hub at Old Oak Common creating 80,000 homes, 20,000 jobs and bringing major economic benefits to the area. I appreciate that you have consulted the relevant Councils like Brent but can you please explain why the members of Assembly's Planning Committee and Assembly Members for the Old Oak Common area were not even informed. let alone consulted?

• Reference: 2013/4827
• Question by: Navin Shah
• Meeting date: 18 December 2013

Is the super hub concept described as 'Mini Manhattan' in the newspaper a likely example of planning / regeneration model you would replicate elsewhere in London to meet the growth projections of London?