Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

  • London Environment Strategy (2)

    • Reference: 2018/5198
    • Question by: Caroline Russell
    • Meeting date: 20 December 2018
    What was the cost of producing the climate change mitigation and energy part of your London Environment Strategy, the associated carbon budgets and analysis underpinning your 2050 zero carbon road map?
  • Disposal of paint and household chemicals

    • Reference: 2018/5199
    • Question by: Caroline Russell
    • Meeting date: 20 December 2018
    A number of constituents have contacted me about the difficulties they have encountered when attempting to correctly dispose of old paint and household chemicals. Has the London Waste and Recycling Board (LWARB) examined this issue and suggested any measures that would help Londoners and councils provide appropriate facilities?
  • London Datastore information on air pollution emissions

    • Reference: 2018/5200
    • Question by: Caroline Russell
    • Meeting date: 20 December 2018
    The latest data in the London Atmospheric Emissions Inventory (LAEI) in the London Datastore is for 2013 and was published in 2016. When is the next LAEI expected to be released, and to what year will the data relate?
  • Protecting wildlife and biodiversity

    • Reference: 2018/5201
    • Question by: Caroline Russell
    • Meeting date: 20 December 2018
    What progress have you made in delivering your pledge to protect wildlife and biodiversity by creating green corridors through the city?
  • TfL Railway arches (4)

    • Reference: 2018/5202
    • Question by: Caroline Russell
    • Meeting date: 20 December 2018
    How many railway arches owned by Transport for London (TfL) have a) short leases, and b) long leases? Could you include vacant properties in these figures and provide details of what this figure was at the end of each of the financial years 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17, and 2017-18?
  • Exemptions from ballots policy

    • Reference: 2018/5203
    • Question by: Siân Berry
    • Meeting date: 20 December 2018
    Since your ballots policy for estate demolition and regeneration came into force, how many reports have your Housing and Land team received from Londoners concerned that councils or developers are seeking exemptions from your ballots policy for estate regeneration when not eligible?
  • Housing and Land officer time and new ballots policy

    • Reference: 2018/5204
    • Question by: Siân Berry
    • Meeting date: 20 December 2018
    How much Housing and Land officer capacity and time has been spent so far investigating concerns raised by residents that your ballots policy for estate demolition and regeneration is not being followed, and how many complaints have been received?
  • City Hall viability training for community groups

    • Reference: 2018/5205
    • Question by: Siân Berry
    • Meeting date: 20 December 2018
    Thank you for your response to my question 2018/2541. What is the average cost of a training session delivered by your expert viability team, how many of these have taken place since the team was formed, how are they publicised, and how many more sessions are planned for 2019?
  • Clapham Park Estate (1)

    • Reference: 2018/5206
    • Question by: Siân Berry
    • Meeting date: 20 December 2018
    Residents of Clapham Park estate were not aware of any future demolition plans when they voted to transfer their estate from Lambeth Council to Metropolitan Housing Trust in 2005, nor were they balloted on the demolition plans that were approved by Lambeth Council in March 2018. How will these residents be helped by your new ballots policy for estate demolition and regeneration on?
  • Clapham Park Estate (2)

    • Reference: 2018/5207
    • Question by: Siân Berry
    • Meeting date: 20 December 2018
    I have received reports that tenants on Clapham Park Estate were persuaded by Metropolitan Housing Trust to sign a petition urging Lambeth Council to grant planning permission to demolish their homes, in the mistaken belief that they would be able to move into new homes to be built on the site. Some of these residents now face eviction. Have you received similar reports and, if so, how are you responding?