Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

  • Tall Buildings (4)

    • Reference: 2018/1206
    • Question by: Nicky Gavron
    • Meeting date: 17 May 2018
    Could the Mayor confirm whether the GLA is requiring proof of extended longevity for Tall Buildings, in light of their anticipated far greater cost for maintenance?
  • Tall Buildings (5)

    • Reference: 2018/1207
    • Question by: Nicky Gavron
    • Meeting date: 17 May 2018
    What is the average annual Service Charge for a typical 20-40 meter Tall Building?
  • Mid-rise Buildings

    • Reference: 2018/1208
    • Question by: Nicky Gavron
    • Meeting date: 17 May 2018
    Could the Mayor please confirm whether the GLA has been talking to the Outer London Boroughs regarding developing appropriate new mid-rise typologies that could greatly boost the housing numbers in a short period of time and reflect London's unique architectural identity?
  • Flats that are marketed, but not selling

    • Reference: 2018/1209
    • Question by: Nicky Gavron
    • Meeting date: 17 May 2018
    Could the Mayor please present his thoughts regarding the future of the many unsold luxury flats that have now reached the market. Will he be imposing any specific measures on the owners/developers of these empty flats?
  • Social rented units in Tall buildings

    • Reference: 2018/1210
    • Question by: Nicky Gavron
    • Meeting date: 17 May 2018
    What is the total number of units in tall buildings given permission by the Mayor since the start of his Mayoralty, and what proportion of these units are at social rent?
  • Air Pollution from Building Sites

    • Reference: 2018/1211
    • Question by: Nicky Gavron
    • Meeting date: 17 May 2018
    Planning conditions should be used to cut air pollution from building sites, according to proposals in a new Welsh Government draft framework on the introduction of clean air zones. What do you think of the proposals and do you have plans to introduce similar measures in London?
  • Natural Capital Accounts for Public Green Space in London

    • Reference: 2018/1212
    • Question by: Nicky Gavron
    • Meeting date: 17 May 2018
    Following the publication of Natural Capital Accounts for Public Green Space in London study in November 2017, the report's authors Vivid Economics, have embarked on a project to create a toolkit to assess the economic value of all urban green infrastructure. What plans, if any, do you have to become involved in the project to ensure that the toolkit will be as useful as possible to the GLA and the boroughs when considering how green infrastructure fits into the fabric of London?
  • Solving Planning Problems

    • Reference: 2018/1213
    • Question by: Nicky Gavron
    • Meeting date: 17 May 2018
    Please give me your views on the following planning policies advocated by the Adam Smith Institute. First, create a new right to build as high as the tallest building on your street. Second, let streets vote to allow every property to add an extra two floors. Third, allow development on green belt land that is within ten minutes' walk of a railway station and, in the southeast, within 45 minutes' travel time of Transport for London's zone 1.
  • The Land Compensation Act

    • Reference: 2018/1214
    • Question by: Nicky Gavron
    • Meeting date: 17 May 2018
    The Land Compensation Act (1961) stipulates that in the event of compulsory purchase, Landowners are to be reimbursed not only for the value of their land as it stood but for its potential value if it were used for something else in the future. This has given landowners an incentive to landbank to be able to sell that land for a higher price in the future and this higher price has forced developers to cut the affordable housing they can afford and to drip feed properties into the market in order to keep prices high. Would you support reform of...
  • Office to Residential Conversions

    • Reference: 2018/1215
    • Question by: Nicky Gavron
    • Meeting date: 17 May 2018
    The Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors believe that office-to-residential permitted development rules have allowed the development of 'extremely poor-quality housing'. Do you agree with their view and what action can you take to ensure that any such conversions are of the highest quality?