Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Question by 1

  • Skills in London (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Andrew Pelling
    • Meeting date: 18 July 2007
    What implications are there for your Skills Board in terms of the significant change in funding flow of taking LSC funding for 6th forms, up to 18, and turning them to local authorities? Has there been any impact or prospective impact?
  • Skills in London (Supplementary) [4]

    • Question by: Andrew Pelling
    • Meeting date: 18 July 2007
    It does seem that the offer made by the Government on different levels of skills training is not really suitable for London. What can be done to persuade the Government to allow us to have this greater emphasis on Level 1 training?
  • TfL Consultants

    • Reference: 2007/1722
    • Question by: Andrew Pelling
    • Meeting date: 18 July 2007
    How is the amount spent on TfL consultants in 2006-07 broken down by Group Directorates, London Buses, DLR, LU and London Rail? How does this compare to 2005-06?
  • TfL Consultants

    • Reference: 2007/1723
    • Question by: Andrew Pelling
    • Meeting date: 18 July 2007
    The end of year TfL monitoring report for 2006-07 operating expenditure on consultants at £165m. What was the other £45m spent on to reach the overall consultancy expenditure?
  • GLA Group Consultants

    • Reference: 2007/1724
    • Question by: Andrew Pelling
    • Meeting date: 18 July 2007
    If TfL alone spent £210m on consultants in 2006-07, what did the other Functional Bodies spend on consultants and how is this broken down into their relevant area types e.g. management consultancy, project management, PR?
  • LFEPA legal advice

    • Reference: 2007/1725
    • Question by: Andrew Pelling
    • Meeting date: 18 July 2007
    How much did you spend on legal fees over the recent LFEPA nominations argument? What legal advice was you given on the issue both before and after your actions?
  • Olympic Land Acquisition

    • Reference: 2007/1726
    • Question by: Andrew Pelling
    • Meeting date: 18 July 2007
    Further to your answers to MQT 1304 and 1306, considering that 95% of the land required for the Olympic Park is now within public sector control and 400 of the 450 units at Clays Lane are vacant why are the acquisition costs only at 50% so far with another £557m still to be spent?
  • Passenger Journeys

    • Reference: 2007/1727
    • Question by: Andrew Pelling
    • Meeting date: 18 July 2007
    Tehre were 2,984.7m TfL passenger journeys in 2006-07; by how much did overall TfL passenger journeys increase from 2005-06 to 2006-07?
  • LFEPA Budget

    • Reference: 2007/1728
    • Question by: Andrew Pelling
    • Meeting date: 18 July 2007
    The end of year monitoring report for LFEPA shows a £7.6m underspend on fire fighter pensions despite an upwardly revised budget during the course of the year. What has happened to produce this result?
  • Olympic precept

    • Reference: 2007/1729
    • Question by: Andrew Pelling
    • Meeting date: 18 July 2007
    The GLA annual monitoring report states that the Olympic precept raised £55.418m in 2006-07 even though the budget was £57.7m. The explanations say that £57.7m was raised, that £0.418m went to the Olympic Programme Support Unit and that the £2.282m difference has been paid to the Olympic reserve, but the budget table says £57.7m as the budget, not £55,418m. Has there been a shortfall in collection and if so, how will the £2.7m over the original £55m expected collection amount that is due to be moved to reserves now be accounted for?