Search questions

• Reference: 2024/0447
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 22 February 2024

What specific actions have been taken during the month of January 2024 by (a) TfL and (b) Camden Council in relation to making Holborn Gyratory safe for cyclists?

• Reference: 2024/0448
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 22 February 2024

Can you please publish the meeting notes for the meeting held on 4th October 2023 with senior taxi representatives?

• Reference: 2024/0449
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 22 February 2024

Can you please provide the Taxi and Private Hire Financial Summary for 2020/2021, 2021/2022 and 2022/2023?

• Reference: 2024/0450
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 22 February 2024

Transport for London has a policy to add a 6 month punishment on top of a driving disqualification imposed by the courts for taxi or private hire drivers for amassing 12 penalty points from the totting-up procedure. In cases where the courts allow a taxi or private hire driver to keep their driving licence, I understand that it is TfL’s policy to ignore successful court pleadings of hardship and keep in place the additional civil punishment, meaning they still revoke the taxi or private hire licence. Will you ask TfL to consider alternative options such as introducing 6-month probationary licences...

• Reference: 2024/0451
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 22 February 2024

Back in 2016, this site was identified as a site that could deliver 120 new homes. The current plan provides for about 35 one-to three-bed homes. Is this really the best outcome and do you think this is good enough?

• Reference: 2024/0452
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 22 February 2024

This development site also includes a key “Archaeology Priority Zone” with some of the largest Roman architectural remains found in London. Residents have raised concerns that TfL and its partners have evaded the “Retain in Situ” obligations. Are you confident that TfL and its property company have appropriately managed the archaeology, heritage and the cultural value of this site?

• Reference: 2024/0453
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 22 February 2024

How many motorists from the EU27 countries (plus Switzerland & Norway) have been fined by the European Parking Collections (EPC) on behalf of TfL since the Brexit withdrawal agreement? Please break down the figures by individual member state and by year.

• Reference: 2024/0455
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 22 February 2024

I understand at least five EU countries (Belgium, France, Spain, Germany and the Netherlands), have claimed that European Parking Collection has accessed personal details of drivers unlawfully for the purposes of ULEZ enforcement when there is no data sharing agreement with the UK for the purposes of such enforcement. Have you investigated whether EPC has used third party agents to access information, and, if so, who are those third-party agents?

• Reference: 2024/0456
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 22 February 2024

Are you satisfied that European Parking Collection and its agents have been transparent about the purpose of the data request, and how do you explain the assertions from authorities in five EU countries that driver data cannot be shared for ULEZ breaches?

• Reference: 2024/0458
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 22 February 2024

Do you think it is fair that citizens, both visitors that incurred fines in London and Londoners who incurred fines abroad, receive fines that have significantly increased in value due to the fact that it takes European Parking Collection many months to contact the people involved?