Search questions

• Reference: 2016/0618
• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 22 February 2016

In your response to 2015/4423 you state that you will be realigning cycle superhighway 8 'away from heavily trafficked and congested roads onto quieter roads'. Please list other superhighways where this course of action is being considered, giving details of the precise locations in question.

• Reference: 2016/0619
• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 22 February 2016

How many metres will be added to a cycle journey from the start of CS8 in Wandsworth to the route's end in Millbank under the new route alignment?

• Reference: 2016/0620
• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 22 February 2016

Please share the evidence TfL have collected to suggest that cyclists are being deterred from using CS8 due to its current alignment in Wandsworth.

• Reference: 2016/0621
• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 22 February 2016

Despite providing an assurance (2015/1512) that TfL had contacted operators signed up to its Fleet Operator Recognition Scheme (FORS) to stress that blind spot stickers should not be used on vehicles under 3.5 tonnes, I have been informed that many operators including gold standard operators are still doing this. Please set out what new measures TfL will take to promote the use of consistent signage by operators and stop the arbitary use of these stickers from bringing FORS into disrepute.

• Reference: 2016/0622
• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 22 February 2016

While I welcome TfL's proposal to reallocate road space away from vehicular traffic to bikes for the western extension of the East West cycle route, some cyclists consider the Westway route identified to be unsuitable because, as this is a flyover, there will be no opportunity to enter or exit this stretch of the route at intermediate points. Please respond to their concerns, explaining why alternative alignments are not being pursued in the current consultation.

• Reference: 2016/0623
• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 22 February 2016

You promised a strategic network of fast, direct cycle routes but this will only be realised if a strategic approach is adopted, like that used to implement the tube and bus networks. Do you agree that TfL should be responsible for those roads with major cycle superhighway routes, just as they are with red routes in order to ensure a consistent strategic approach across the capital and prevent individual boroughs from stymying the plans?

• Reference: 2016/0624
• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 22 February 2016

Please provide an estimate of the cost of removing all completed sections of cycle superhighways.

• Reference: 2016/0625
• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 22 February 2016

What impact would removing all existing sections of cycle superhighway have on the anticipated growth of cycling in London?

• Reference: 2016/0626
• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 22 February 2016

The Chairman of TfL's finance and policy committee stated that the public private partnership (PPP) funding and design, build, maintain and operate contract approach will not achieve the best value for money for the Silvertown Tunnel scheme. How do you respond and what are the alternatives?

• Reference: 2016/0627
• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 22 February 2016

London Bus Services Limited (Company No. 03914787) is TfL's wholly-owned subsidiary that contracts 100 percent of London's public bus services from a number of subcontracting bus operators. My understanding of the hiring arrangements as stipulated in Section 81 (1) (a) of the Public Passenger Vehicles Act 1981 is that in order to subcontract public bus services, London Bus Services Limited is required to have, inter alia, an operator's licence and a named Transport Manager. Please provide details of both.