Search questions

• Reference: 2016/0638
• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 22 February 2016

Last month you told me that there had been a replacement rate for Right to Buy sales of 3:1 through your programmes in three boroughs. Please provide figures, broken down by borough, bedroom number and tenure, for homes (a) sold through Right to Buy, for which you received money, (b) homes started by the GLA using Right to Buy proceeds and (c) homes completed by the GLA using Right to Buy proceeds.

• Reference: 2016/0639
• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 22 February 2016

Of the total cost to the GLA of building the Right to Buy replacement homes, how much has come from Right to Buy proceeds, and how much from other sources of funding?

• Reference: 2016/0640
• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 22 February 2016

What is the average grant level for replacement homes financed by the GLA, broken down by borough?

• Reference: 2016/0641
• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 22 February 2016

How many replacement homes have been built on land owned by the GLA group?

• Reference: 2016/0642
• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 22 February 2016

How much of your Estate Regeneration Fund remains unallocated?

• Reference: 2016/0643
• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 22 February 2016

How much of your Housing Bank funds remains unallocated?

• Reference: 2016/0644
• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 22 February 2016

How much of your London Green Fund remains unallocated, or will it be recycled and available for reinvestment in the next year?

• Reference: 2016/0645
• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 22 February 2016

Are you on course to answer all the outstanding Mayor's Questions before purdah commences?

• Reference: 2016/0646
• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 22 February 2016

Please comment on reports that government advisors have been attending TfL meetings on private hire regulation.

• Reference: 2016/0382
• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 10 February 2016

Transport for London, through the issuance of London Service Permits, has regulatory authority over local bus services that run outside its own network within the Greater London area. Section 6 of the London Service Permit guidance document states "The proposed service must not prejudice the safety of, or cause delay or inconvenience to, other road users in Greater London, including pedestrians and cyclists." Will you make issuance of a London Service Permit to coach companies conditional on their adoption of the Confidential Incident Reporting and Analysis System, CIRAS, so that the safety of road users in London is not prejudiced?