Search questions

• Reference: 2016/0067
• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 20 January 2016

What is the purpose of the new CLoS technical note?

• Reference: 2016/0068
• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 20 January 2016

How many TfL schemes have been assessed using this tool so far, are all TfL design teams trained to use it and have they been instructed to judge every cycling scheme using it?

• Reference: 2016/0069
• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 20 January 2016

When TfL assessed the plans for this scheme using the Cycling Level of Service (CLoS) tool, were any critical issues identified? If so, please describe them and explain what changes will be made to the design to eliminate them.

• Reference: 2016/0070
• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 20 January 2016

TfL plan to remove the cycle lane on Loampit Hill because it is under the recommended minimum width and INSTEAD create a wider westbound lane which 'would encourage cyclists to take an appropriate position in the main traffic lane'. Exactly how wide is the existing cycle lane and is it TfL policy to remove cycle lanes under the minimum width across the entire TfL road network?

• Reference: 2016/0071
• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 20 January 2016

A constituent considers that the removal of the cycle lane on Loampit Hill would create two critical CLoS failures in terms of volume of traffic and interaction with HGVs. Please comment.

• Reference: 2016/0072
• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 20 January 2016

Thank you for your response to 2015/2654 in which you stated 'TfL and Southwark Council are currently discussing improvements to the proposed junction which will be published shortly.' Have these improvements now been finalised? If so, where can these be viewed online? If not, by when will the changes have been finalised?

• Reference: 2016/0073
• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 20 January 2016

What Cycling Level of Service (CLoS) score did TfL award the original plans for this junction? Did the original plans meet the minimum CLoS score required by TfL before plans can go to public consultation?

• Reference: 2016/0074
• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 20 January 2016

What Cycling Level of Service (CLoS) score has TfL given the amended plans for this junction?

• Reference: 2016/0075
• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 20 January 2016

The December 2015 TfL board papers state 'It has proved impossible to produce a design for the northern end of the CS11 route that meets the required standards.' Please explain the reasons why this is the case.

• Reference: 2016/0076
• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 20 January 2016

The December 2015 TfL board papers provide consultation, design and construction dates for the southern section of CS11 but no details for the northern part. Please provide an assurance to Barnet and Brent residents that the entire route into central London will be completed and provide an estimated completion date for the entire route.