Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of

Category

Meeting type

Organisation

Question by 2

Status

Year

  • Failure of Solar Together (8)

    • Reference: 2024/0751
    • Question by: Emma Best
    • Meeting date: 22 February 2024
    How will you substitute the environmental benefits that a successful Solar Together scheme would have resulted in?

  • Failure of Solar Together (9)

    • Reference: 2024/0752
    • Question by: Emma Best
    • Meeting date: 22 February 2024
    Do you anticipate any costs from the Mayor’s budget as a result of discontinuing the Solar Together scheme?

  • Failure of Solar Together (10)

    • Reference: 2024/0753
    • Question by: Emma Best
    • Meeting date: 22 February 2024
    When will the evaluation of Solar Together first promised in June 2023 be completed by?

  • Failure of Solar Together (11)

    • Reference: 2024/0754
    • Question by: Emma Best
    • Meeting date: 22 February 2024
    Will the evaluation of Solar Together include an assessment of the scheme’s promotional costs, which total nearly £1 million?

  • Failure of Solar Together (12)

    • Reference: 2024/0755
    • Question by: Emma Best
    • Meeting date: 22 February 2024
    In hindsight, was spending nearly £1 million promoting Solar Together an efficient use of public finances?

  • Failure of Solar Together (13)

    • Reference: 2024/0756
    • Question by: Emma Best
    • Meeting date: 22 February 2024
    On reflection, what lessons have you taken from the failure of Solar Together, and what will you do differently going forward?

  • Royal Albert Dock housing (2)

    • Reference: 2024/0569
    • Question by: Siân Berry
    • Meeting date: 22 February 2024
    Thank you for your answer to my question 2024/0413, in which you said: “The procurement of a Master Developer has been structured to allow for a variety of delivery organisations to participate in the site’s development.” Could you share the procurement brief and other relevant documents with me?

  • Housing for women leaving the criminal justice system (6)

    • Reference: 2024/0570
    • Question by: Siân Berry
    • Meeting date: 22 February 2024
    Campaigners continue to raise with me the lack of progress on the actions contained in the motion, passed unanimously by the London Assembly on 3 March 2022, Safe Homes for Women Leaving Prison. Could you confirm what work has been carried out to fulfil the actions in the motion by: a) the relevant departments within the GLA, b) your Deputy Mayor for Housing and Residential Development, and c) your Deputy Mayor for Policing and Crime?

  • Urban Greening Factor and mature trees (3)

    • Reference: 2024/0571
    • Question by: Siân Berry
    • Meeting date: 22 February 2024
    Thank you for your answer to my question 2023/3969. With regard to the promised: “note covering the implementation of green infrastructure policies,” could you confirm whether: a) the Urban Greening Factor (UGF) data will relate to CAVAT or canopy cover data, b) this data will disclose and/or highlight discrepancies between positive UGF data where it conflicts with net loss of ‘public welfare’ value or CAVAT valuations, and c) where the note, which in the same answer you said you aimed: “to publish on the GLA website by the end of this financial year,” has been published and, if so, where?

  • Bridgewater development and Pudding Mill allotments

    • Reference: 2024/0572
    • Question by: Siân Berry
    • Meeting date: 22 February 2024
    Given the temporary suspension of the Bridgewater Development due to design concerns and compliance with fire safety regulations, could you write to the Manor Gardening Society with more information about any forthcoming design revisions which may affect its members, and reassure them that any changes will not further compromise their access to natural light?