Search questions

• Reference: 2015/0809
• Question by: John Biggs
• Meeting date: 11 March 2015

What funding do LLDC provide for jobs and skills activity in the 6 Olympic (now 'Growth') Boroughs?

• Reference: 2015/0810
• Question by: John Biggs
• Meeting date: 11 March 2015

How is the LLDC dealing with 'cliff edge' issues on its boundaries? Where are these most severe and what particular initiatives are being pursued?

• Reference: 2015/0811
• Question by: John Biggs
• Meeting date: 11 March 2015

What jobs and housing guarantees are being given to Olympic/Growth Borough residents? To what extent do these apply solely to the residents in whose borough a particular development occurs?

• Reference: 2015/0812
• Question by: John Biggs
• Meeting date: 11 March 2015

Are the LLDC supporting the stopping of International trains at Stratford and if so how?

• Reference: 2015/0813
• Question by: John Biggs
• Meeting date: 11 March 2015

What agreements exist for community use of former Olympic venues, and how are these monitored and reviewed?

• Question by: John Biggs
• Meeting date: 11 March 2015

John Biggs AM: I am very grateful for your answers to date. You will be aware, though, as you say - and this is a question to the Mayor - that this is a cross-party initiative by and large and you have stepped into the shoes of your illustrious predecessor, who was very clear that the Olympics were but a down payment on the wider regeneration of the area. You are saying quite a lot of things in support of that. I am happy by and large with what has happened in the Park. There are a few problems, which...

• Reference: 2015/0567
• Question by: John Biggs
• Meeting date: 23 February 2015

The Manor Gardening Society was displaced by the Olympic Games developments, as you know. The replacement site at Eton Manor has been substituted for by making the Marsh Lane temporary relocation site permanent. This partially satisfies the replacement required under the Olympic Planning approvals. The second site, however, at Pudding Mill Lane still needs to be handed over. According to the Planning Permission this was to have happened by December 2014. The two sites are in addition to be 'greater in quality and quantity' than those lost from the old site. I understand that the partially completed site has been...

• Reference: 2015/0568
• Question by: John Biggs
• Meeting date: 23 February 2015

This signalised turn is about to be lost, as required under the Barking Riverside Planning permission. Can you advise on the timescale for remodelling the Movers Lane/Renwick Road junctions on this road?

• Reference: 2015/0569
• Question by: John Biggs
• Meeting date: 23 February 2015

Can you describe the improvement works to these stations and the timescales for them?

• Reference: 2015/0570
• Question by: John Biggs
• Meeting date: 23 February 2015

Now that this has closed, what, if any, plans are there for the use or ownership, of the site? Does it make sense for the GLA to consider ownership because of the possibility through this of consolidating ownership in the area to facilitate development of other uses?