Search questions

• Question by: Samantha Heath
• Meeting date: 17 March 2004

We need a comment on it.

• Question by: Samantha Heath
• Meeting date: 17 March 2004

We have worked with you extensively on our flooding report, and Darren Johnson actually signed up to that, so I was quite surprised at the Green Group's questioning. But the issues that we did identify that were of concern to the Committee were the commitment to the Green Grid, in terms of work you have done with the ODPM and we do recognise that the ODPM have actually recently announced more funding for the Green Grid. But I wanted to get a sense of how important they thought it was, and also to do with the Kate Barker report that...

• Question by: Samantha Heath
• Meeting date: 17 March 2004

On the ODPM, how convinced are they of the case?

• Reference: 2004/0320
• Question by: Meg Hillier
• Meeting date: 25 February 2004

Given that the Greenwich Mela was supported by the Greater London Authority what prospect is there of the Waltham Forest Mela receiving similar support? .

• Reference: 2004/0321
• Question by: Meg Hillier
• Meeting date: 25 February 2004

How many tenders did your receive to run the London 2004 St Patrick's Day celebrations after your August invitation to tender? After your second advert inviting tenders? How many potential organisers were interviewed before the contract was awarded? .

• Reference: 2004/0322
• Question by: Meg Hillier
• Meeting date: 25 February 2004

Why was a decision to share insurance cost with Live Ltd, organisers of New Year's Eve 2003, only made in December 2003? Was this part of the original contract? .

• Reference: 2004/0323
• Question by: Meg Hillier
• Meeting date: 25 February 2004

You contributed £15,000 toward the celebration of Chinese New Year in London. What plans do you have to fund Chinese New Year 2005? .

• Reference: 2004/0324
• Question by: Meg Hillier
• Meeting date: 25 February 2004

Can you list by event your proposed expenditure on events in London for the next financial year (2004/2005)? .

• Reference: 2004/0325
• Question by: Meg Hillier
• Meeting date: 25 February 2004

Do you acknowledge that the removal of the 505 bus service in Chingford and the reduction of the replacement mobility service the 905 from two to one days a week is a significant reduction in service? What is your advice to the users of the 905? If more people used the 905 would Transport for London increase the service? .

• Reference: 2004/0326
• Question by: Meg Hillier
• Meeting date: 25 February 2004

What studies have Transport for London undertaken to ensure that a bendy bus is suitable for the 73 bus route? Has any particular consideration been given to the logistics of what will happen when two buses travelling in opposite directions meet in Stoke Newington Church Street? .