Search questions

• Question by: Victor Anderson
• Meeting date: 18 September 2002

I certainly will work on that. But important part has also been played in the drawing of this strategy by the options appraisal. And the options appraisal, if you look at that, looks at four options, one of which is completely ludicrous and two of which you are clearly not going to agree, and then it's not a surprise that you've picked the one out of the four that you wanted in the first place. That doesn't seem to be a serious option appraisal. In the second half of that document it makes some very sensible comments about the spatial...

• Question by: Victor Anderson
• Meeting date: 18 September 2002

Well I think some of us don't like the way the world is going. Some people voted for you because they thought that you shared that view. But you've referred to the importance of the supplementary planning guidance. I think in particular the supplementary planning guidance on sustainable design and construction is essential to the delivery of the plan, both for good quality urban design and to reduce the impact on the environment of the new housing which is envisaged. So, along with higher density, there has to be a very effective supplementary planning guidance in this area. Can we...

• Question by: Victor Anderson
• Meeting date: 18 September 2002

Okay. It can't really play that part in the debate if you don't actually see the document. And I think we also need to see the legal advice that says that that guidance is going to be accompanying it.

• Question by: Victor Anderson
• Meeting date: 18 September 2002

Given that Graham Tope is your cabinet advisor on human rights and equality, wouldn't it be more constructive if he put some time into the work of drawing up the Cultural Strategy and the Children's Strategy? Wouldn't that be more constructive than sitting here complaining?

• Reference: 2002/0384
• Question by: Victor Anderson
• Meeting date: 16 July 2002

Is the Mayor satisfied that, in its work on SERAS, the LDA is complying with Section 373 of the GLA Act, which requires it to have regard to the Mayor's environmental strategies? .

• Reference: 2002/0391
• Question by: Victor Anderson
• Meeting date: 16 July 2002

What is the significance of the Mayor's adoption of a target of a 15% reduction in traffic congestion in central London in the "Key Performance Measures" section of the Draft London Plan (page 285) when in his Transport Strategy he set a target (reaffirmed on page 191 of the Draft London Plan) of 15% reduction in central London not of the amount of congestion, but of weekday road traffic itself? .

• Reference: 2002/0383
• Question by: Victor Anderson
• Meeting date: 16 July 2002

Will the Mayor list the members of the GLA family group working on the South East Regional Airport Study (SERAS) consultation, together with their main responsibilities?

• Reference: 2002/0387
• Question by: Victor Anderson
• Meeting date: 16 July 2002

Who decided to adopt the City Hall Etiquette document, what is its status, and will staff be disciplined for not adhering to it? .

• Reference: 2002/0390
• Question by: Victor Anderson
• Meeting date: 16 July 2002

What role did Transport for London play in the drawing up of the Draft London Plan? .

• Question by: Victor Anderson
• Meeting date: 16 July 2002

How are you going to coordinate the response of the GLA family to the Government's study on airports, because on the one hand you have, in the air quality strategy, noise strategy and the energy strategy, a lot of concern expressed about the environmental impact of aviation, but on the other hand, we have the public section of the report to the LDA Board in June which is very pro-airport expansion. How are you going to bring these two sides of the argument together?