Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 2

  • Nominee Passes

    • Reference: 2015/1950
    • Question by: Andrew Boff
    • Meeting date: 17 June 2015
    Research by my office has discovered that 8.4 million journeys were taken last year by those with nominee passes. This amounts to £22.2m every year in lost fare revenues. Do you think that this is flagrant waste of taxpayers' money in a time of such fiscal constraint?
  • Waltham Diving Facilities

    • Reference: 2015/0391
    • Question by: Andrew Boff
    • Meeting date: 21 January 2015
    The Waltham Forest Pool and Track redevelopment plan does not include a renewal of the 5m diving board facilities. Is this regrettable and what impact do you think this could have on the Olympic legacy?
  • Police Resources

    • Reference: 2013/0001
    • Question by: Roger Evans
    • Meeting date: 16 January 2013
    How do you intend to use police resources more efficiently over the next three years?
  • Budget proposals

    • Reference: 2013/0003
    • Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
    • Meeting date: 16 January 2013
    What flexibility is there to alter the Mayor's budget proposals following the current public consultation on the draft Police and Crime Plan?
  • G4S and Policing the Olympics

    • Reference: 2012/0037-2
    • Question by: Joanne McCartney
    • Meeting date: 19 July 2012
    Commissioner, when were the Metropolitan Police Service first aware of problems with the private security firm Group 4 Security (G4S) and their ability to deliver their promised security complement?
  • Diamond Jubilee

    • Reference: 2012/0038-2
    • Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
    • Meeting date: 19 July 2012
    I did want to pick up a question I had asked last month, we had the Diamond Jubilee, were there any particular operational issues that were learned, Commissioner, that you are then applying to the games themselves?
  • Safer Neighbourhood Teams

    • Reference: 2012/0039-2
    • Question by: Steve O'Connell
    • Meeting date: 19 July 2012
    Returning if I may to the effects, Commissioner, of the G4S ineptitude on the boroughs. I am pleased to hear your professional judgment that you expect perhaps no further draw or demand upon those resources, but clearly that remains to be seen as it plays out. However, I respect your opinion on that. Something that worries many residents is around the pressure on the Safer Neighbourhood Teams (SNT). The Mayor has given a commitment that the Safer Neighbourhood Teams will be staffed during this period. But remember they are starting from quite a low base at the moment, already the...
  • MPS Resources

    • Reference: 2012/0040-2
    • Question by: Jennette Arnold OBE
    • Meeting date: 19 July 2012
    Chair, it is just a quick question, and it goes back I think to where Steve [O'Connell] started. Commissioner, what I just wanted to raise with you was, as well as the Olympics, and I welcome the assurances that you have given from where you are at the moment, it is summer time, even though it is so wet out there, and during this time there would normally be contingency plans for events that happen, certainly in some boroughs that I am familiar with, over that summer period. You would normally, I know in the boroughs I represent, they would...
  • Olympics Security

    • Reference: 2012/0041-2
    • Question by: Len Duvall OBE
    • Meeting date: 19 July 2012
    A question to the Commissioner. Just earlier on, and I apologise for arriving late, but I heard you, in terms of you answering the questions on the milestones. I want to take you back to the Olympic security issue. Of course in July when they indicated they could not fulfil the contract, that is quite a clear milestone. You mentioned before in the autumn of 2011 the jump from 3,000 odd to 10,000.
  • LOCOG

    • Reference: 2012/0042-2
    • Question by: Andrew Boff
    • Meeting date: 19 July 2012
    When the last Government decided to set up LOCOG as a private company rather than a public agency, it was sold as a way of speeding up their procurement. After extensive questioning from all sides of this Assembly, it now appears that the motive may have been to escape the sort of standards of transparency that one would have expected from public bodies. Can you tell me, have you ever expressed dissatisfaction with the timing or quality of the information coming from LOCOG?