Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 2

  • 24 hour Freedom Pass on Overground Rail in Enfield & Haringey

    • Reference: 2012/0012-1
    • Question by: Joanne McCartney
    • Meeting date: 20 June 2012
    Many residents in Enfield & Haringey rely on the overground rail network but they cannot yet use their freedom pass 24 hours a day and are at a disadvantage compared to residents living near tube services. What action have you, and will you take to ensure that all freedom pass holders can access overground rail services 24 hours a day?
  • Kings Cross Gyratory

    • Reference: 2012/0040-1
    • Question by: Jennette Arnold OBE
    • Meeting date: 20 June 2012
    In your answer to question 1372 / 2012 you state that 'A series of key stakeholder workshops will be organised in June which will allow various parties to discuss their aspirations for the work at King's Cross Gyratory and to highlight the issues that affect local residents.' Given the confusion that has arisen with my constituents regarding works to the King's Cross Gyratory in the past can you please answer each of the following in full: a) Please provide a list of all the 'key stakeholder groups' who will be invited to these workshops b) Please outline details of how...
  • Concern (Supplementary) [12]

    • Question by: Jennette Arnold OBE
    • Meeting date: 20 June 2012
    Yes, Peter, and that is the sort of response I have been getting for the last couple of years, and luckily I can say to you that the Borough of Lambeth have recently run a most successful campaign using ads; it is the campaign 'Know the Difference'. It is a campaign that Assembly Member Kit Malthouse in his role when he was head of Mayor's Office for Police and Crime (MOPAC) endorsed and commended. It has been taken onboard by other people and the only organisation that did not commit to it locally in Lambeth was TfL. These campaigns were...
  • Question and Answer Session: Olympic Park Legacy Company

    • Reference: 2011/0075-1
    • Question by: Dee Doocey
    • Meeting date: 16 March 2011
    Dee Doocey (Chair): Can I formally welcome Baroness Ford and Andrew Altman to the meeting. Baroness Ford is the Chair of the Olympic Park Legacy Company (OPLC) and Andrew Altman is the Chief Executive. Thank you very much for coming. If I could explain how the session is going to work; I understand that Margaret and Andrew are going to give a five minute opening statement. I will then ask a Member from each Group to put a question in the following order: the Labour Group, followed by the Liberal Democrat Group, followed by the Conservative Group, followed by the...
  • Question and Answer Session: Olympic Park Legacy Company (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Andrew Boff
    • Meeting date: 16 March 2011
    Could you tell me what role the OPLC will have in consulting the populated parts of the proposed MDC?
  • Question and Answer Session: Olympic Park Legacy Company (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Richard Barnbrook
    • Meeting date: 16 March 2011
    Thank you, Chair. I would like to take a step back as we look towards legacy. We are all aware in this Chamber that the host boroughs of east London are some of the poorest locations in the capital. 70,000 unemployed adults are in the seven east London boroughs that neighbour the Olympic site. I am looking at the foundations of a legacy. How is it possible to truly call this a legacy when, at this moment in time, of the 5,381 employed people on the site, only 20% are from the five hosting boroughs and 48% are non-British? This...
  • Question and Answer Session: Olympic Park Legacy Company (Supplementary) [3]

    • Question by: Jennette Arnold OBE
    • Meeting date: 16 March 2011
    Thank you, Chair. I have got a number of questions. Firstly, to go back to what John was talking about, on the people legacy. The Olympic Park set itself benchmarks, as you know, Margaret. I know that you have been aware of the programmes it implemented. The sadness is that those teams may now well disperse. I welcome what you are doing with schools. Would you agree with me that you need also to work with local colleges, in the way that the ODA did, and what you need to do is, in a sense, take the baton and do...
  • Question and Answer Session: Olympic Park Legacy Company (Supplementary) [4]

    • Question by: Mike Tuffrey
    • Meeting date: 16 March 2011
    Can I touch on the sustainability assurance aspects. The Commission for a Sustainable 2012 does not just do the construction and the staging of the Games, it includes legacy, albeit that process is going to come to an end in about 2013. The first question, for the record, is do you welcome that scrutiny and will you cooperate fully with the Commission for a Sustainable 2012 for the legacy aspects?
  • Question and Answer Session: Olympic Park Legacy Company (Supplementary) [5]

    • Question by: Gareth Bacon MP
    • Meeting date: 16 March 2011
    I am interested in the cost of running the sports venues once they are into legacy mode. I understand that the OPLC will be responsible for the Stadium, the Aquatics Centre, the mixed sports venue and the tower. Do you expect the sports venues will require public subsidy once they are in legacy mode to keep them afloat, or will they stand on their own two feet?
  • Question and Answer Session: Olympic Park Legacy Company (Supplementary) [6]

    • Question by: Mike Tuffrey
    • Meeting date: 16 March 2011
    I wanted to look at the housing side of what you are doing and dig into the finances behind that will underpin the proportions between social affordable, owner occupied and, indeed, private rented possibly. When you were here last time we talked a lot about the remediation and the 60 centimetres and the impact of switching to the housing that you gave us the pictures for where there is a garden at the back. Can you update us on your financial modelling about the additional costs that are associated with remediation for family sized housing and how that impacts the...