Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 2

  • Transport Strategy (Supplementary) [7]

    • Question by: Len Duvall OBE
    • Meeting date: 28 June 2017
    Len Duvall AM: Thank you very much. To go back to the most challenging issue and just briefly about what, Mike, you said around technology and when technology becomes available, we know that that is constantly evolving and speeding up in some cases. Val, in answer to the question from Assembly Member Bailey, you talked about how this document really is what is in the business plan we are concentrating on and you have no long‑term plans, but in the direction of travel of the document it is quite clear you are supporting the Assembly Transport Committee’s plans for road...
  • Increasing capacity on 108 bus route

    • Reference: 2014/2997
    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 10 September 2014
    TfL recently confirmed that capacity will be boosted on this severely overcrowded route, beginning in the autumn. Please provide the date from which additional buses will be brought into service on this route. Please also provide an update on the longer-term solution of running a new Kidbrooke Village to North Greenwich route.
  • Temperature target on buses

    • Reference: 2014/2998
    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 10 September 2014
    Your response to MQ number 2014/2689 did not disclose a health and safety target temperature for London buses. Please confirm whether or not TfL has such a target and, if it does, please let me know what it is.
  • New bus - emissions

    • Reference: 2014/2999
    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 10 September 2014
    In your answer to my question 1381/2013 in May last year, you stated that you would be testing emissions of the New Bus for London on route 24. Now you have had a year to compare results, will you please publish them in full, including the average mpg for the bus, broken down by month?
  • Crossrail – further extensions

    • Reference: 2014/3000
    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 10 September 2014
    The Transport Secretary recently announced that Crossrail could be extended to Hertfordshire. Please list any representations you have made to the Government on this or other extensions to Crossrail.
  • Crossrail – link to Thamesmead

    • Reference: 2014/3001
    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 10 September 2014
    Thamesmead is one of the largest areas of London to have no railway station of its own. Have you studied the potential for a future extension of Crossrail to the area?
  • Vauxhall Bus Station Redevelopment

    • Reference: 2014/3002
    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 10 September 2014
    Some residents groups around Vauxhall want TfL to remove the gyratory at Vauxhall Cross but retain the bus station. Will TfL model the impact of this option on traffic levels, journey times, air and noise pollution levels, and the bus network, and release the results to the public?
  • Kings Cross Gyratory (1)

    • Reference: 2014/3003
    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 10 September 2014
    Of the 433 respondents to TfL's consultation on changes to be made at this gyratory, 220 supported the introduction of segregated cycle lanes and/or advance stop lines at the traffic lights for cyclists. Please give the reasons why the decision has been taken by TfL not to implement to the wishes of 52% of respondents.
  • Kings Cross Gyratory (2)

    • Reference: 2014/3004
    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 10 September 2014
    How much did this public consultation cost?
  • Kings Cross Gyratory (3)

    • Reference: 2014/3005
    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 10 September 2014
    Eight key stakeholders - LB Camden, LB Islington, Camden Cycling Campaign, Sustrans, UCL, Southwark Living Streets, University of the Arts and Cycling Embassy of Great Britain - expressed their concern about the lack of segregated, mandatory cycle lanes in TfL's plans for Kings Cross gyratory, yet TfL plan to go ahead without introducing them. Will TfL continue to ignore comments from key stakeholder groups in all of the impending Better Junctions reviews?