Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 2

  • Review process of LDA funding (Supplementary) [25]

    • Question by: Tony Arbour
    • Meeting date: 16 January 2008
    So you are telling the Assembly that, simply based on the information that you held in your records, on the assumption that all of your records were complete, you were able to come to a conclusion with regard to what Brenda Stern said, that as far as you were concerned there is no case to answer? Would not the obvious thing for you to have done have been to go to the source of the allegations? Is that not an elementary thing to do? Why did you limit your investigation just to the material which you say that you hold?
  • Review process of LDA funding (Supplementary) [37]

    • Question by: Bob Blackman
    • Meeting date: 16 January 2008
    So are those the records that the LDA has of email traffic and other aspects?
  • London Development Agency Funding of Organisations (Supplementary) [10]

    • Question by: Tony Arbour
    • Meeting date: 16 January 2008
    So you are telling the Assembly that, simply based on the information that you held in your records, on the assumption that all of your records were complete, you were able to come to a conclusion with regard to what Brenda Stern said, that as far as you were concerned there is no case to answer? Would not the obvious thing for you to have done have been to go to the source of the allegations? Is that not an elementary thing to do? Why did you limit your investigation just to the material which you say that you hold?
  • London Development Agency Funding of Organisations (Supplementary) [14]

    • Question by: Sally Hamwee
    • Meeting date: 16 January 2008
    Further discussions on a broader basis will take place with a more limited number of organisations, is that correct?
  • London Development Agency Funding of Organisations (Supplementary) [23]

    • Question by: Sally Hamwee
    • Meeting date: 16 January 2008
    Not the rest of the 12 that were looked at?
  • Limitations of CCTV

    • Reference: 2007/0109-1
    • Question by: Murad Qureshi
    • Meeting date: 07 November 2007
    A joint report by the Home Office and police found that more than 80% of CCTV pictures are of such poor quality they are no good for police purposes, and most cameras are in the wrong places to help in fighting serious crime or terrorism. * Is the purpose of CCTV cameras, to tackle low-level, high-volume crime and disorder in town centres, being undermined by a lack of quality? * The report also claimed that authorities have no idea how many cameras exist despite claims that Britain is the most watched nation in the world, with more than 4m in...
  • Budget Priorities

    • Reference: 2007/0110-1
    • Question by: Jenny Jones
    • Meeting date: 07 November 2007
    In allocating your police budget between different types of policing activity, what are your priorities and where are you seeking savings?
  • Next Steps for SNTS?

    • Reference: 2007/0111-1
    • Question by: Graham Tope
    • Meeting date: 07 November 2007
    What are the next steps for Safer Neighbourhood Teams in London?
  • Government Targets

    • Reference: 2007/0112-1
    • Question by: Angie Bray
    • Meeting date: 07 November 2007
    Do you share the view of Bob Quick, Chief Constable of Surrey that government targets are making officers and the CPS "skew" their operations towards easy results?
  • Impact of Olympics on MPS Budget

    • Reference: 2007/0113-1
    • Question by: Damian Hockney
    • Meeting date: 07 November 2007
    Can you please supply a summary of the impact of the 2012 Olympics on the MPS Budget between now and 2013? There have been suggestions that some aspects of security in the Budget for 2012 are not allowed for in either the MPS Budget or the revised 2012 Budget. Please can you state what is being done to ensure that London council tax payers will not be required to fund this expenditure.