Search questions

• Question by: Andrew Pelling
• Meeting date: 06 December 2006

I was trying to be very polite and not antagonise you in the way you have been by other questioners!

• Question by: Andrew Pelling
• Meeting date: 06 December 2006

TfL gets a huge amount of correspondence about its consultations and other issues. It must be a very difficult task to deal with. In the new GLA Bill do you think there will be any value in codifying the responsibilities of TfL to respond to consultations on traffic issues?

• Question by: Andrew Pelling
• Meeting date: 06 December 2006

Some people feel that TfL is not responsive when it comes to consultations and has difficulty responding to the amount of correspondence that you might get from customers. With the opportunity of a new bill going through Parliament, do you think there might be an opportunity to codify, or even restrict, some of those responsibilities?

• Reference: 2006/0450-1
• Question by: Andrew Pelling
• Meeting date: 06 December 2006

When will the ANPR cameras used to enforce the Western Extension of the congestion charge be replaced?

• Question by: Andrew Pelling
• Meeting date: 15 March 2006

Do you think it would be reasonable to say that in peak hours `bendy' buses are not as appropriate a bus service as ordinary double-deckers would be for people who are frail or unwell? It really is a service best left for perhaps the fit city worker to use during peak hours, bearing in mind that you would be fairly unlikely to be guaranteed to get a seat?

• Question by: Andrew Pelling
• Meeting date: 15 March 2006

Do you feel that some of the controversy that arose on the issue of the withdrawal of family Travelcards and the Mayor's offer of free travel on the Underground show that it is much more difficult for TfL and for the Mayor to be able to offer solutions for South London transport, bearing in mind our lack of an Underground system there? What do you feel should be the approach of the Mayor, TfL, Assembly Members, and London MPs, to lobby for improved public transport provision in South London? After all, in some of these debates about investing in Crossrail...

• Question by: Andrew Pelling
• Meeting date: 15 March 2006

I will make the fundamental error then of talking about providing choices to Government. Do you think that on the Croydon Tramlink we should go with the flow in terms of just continuing to promote the extension to Crystal Palace, or do you think we should resurrect some of the other options that were being considered before?

• Reference: 2006/0089-1
• Question by: Andrew Pelling
• Meeting date: 15 March 2006

What progress has been made by TfL in getting the TOC's towards an Oystercard agreement?

• Reference: 2006/0092-1
• Question by: Andrew Pelling
• Meeting date: 15 March 2006

Croydon Tramlink is included in the 2006-007 budget as being part of the buses & tram budgetary increase of 12.9% with a net increase of £63m. With an expected £302m due to be spent on surface transport capital projects in 2006-07, how much is allocated towards the development of tramlink extensions to Sutton and Streatham? What is the progress of those plans? When can we expect to see South London transport users benefiting from the tramlink extension?