Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

  • Rogue Landlord and Letting Agent Checker (1)

    • Reference: 2018/5123
    • Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
    • Meeting date: 20 December 2018
    I understand two boroughs have been identified as having no relevant data to upload to the Rogue Landlord and Letting Agent Checker. Can you please state which boroughs these are?
  • Rogue Landlord and Letting Agent Checker (2)

    • Reference: 2018/5124
    • Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
    • Meeting date: 20 December 2018
    Given that there are some London boroughs which have undertaken little or no enforcement activity against rogue landlords, what work are you doing to help increase and improve enforcement activity in every corner of London?
  • Barking Riverside infrastructure

    • Reference: 2018/5153
    • Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
    • Meeting date: 20 December 2018
    Director’s Decision 2300 allocates £10 million of grant funding from the Affordable Homes Programme 2016 – 2021 to Barking Riverside Limited to meet a shortfall in available funds to deliver infrastructure within the Barking Riverside Project. Are you content that this is an equitable deal between the public sector and Barking Riverside Limited, with risk of the development and the potential benefits fairly shared?
  • Exemptions from ballots policy

    • Reference: 2018/5203
    • Question by: Siân Berry
    • Meeting date: 20 December 2018
    Since your ballots policy for estate demolition and regeneration came into force, how many reports have your Housing and Land team received from Londoners concerned that councils or developers are seeking exemptions from your ballots policy for estate regeneration when not eligible?
  • Housing and Land officer time and new ballots policy

    • Reference: 2018/5204
    • Question by: Siân Berry
    • Meeting date: 20 December 2018
    How much Housing and Land officer capacity and time has been spent so far investigating concerns raised by residents that your ballots policy for estate demolition and regeneration is not being followed, and how many complaints have been received?
  • City Hall viability training for community groups

    • Reference: 2018/5205
    • Question by: Siân Berry
    • Meeting date: 20 December 2018
    Thank you for your response to my question 2018/2541. What is the average cost of a training session delivered by your expert viability team, how many of these have taken place since the team was formed, how are they publicised, and how many more sessions are planned for 2019?
  • Clapham Park Estate (1)

    • Reference: 2018/5206
    • Question by: Siân Berry
    • Meeting date: 20 December 2018
    Residents of Clapham Park estate were not aware of any future demolition plans when they voted to transfer their estate from Lambeth Council to Metropolitan Housing Trust in 2005, nor were they balloted on the demolition plans that were approved by Lambeth Council in March 2018. How will these residents be helped by your new ballots policy for estate demolition and regeneration on?
  • Clapham Park Estate (2)

    • Reference: 2018/5207
    • Question by: Siân Berry
    • Meeting date: 20 December 2018
    I have received reports that tenants on Clapham Park Estate were persuaded by Metropolitan Housing Trust to sign a petition urging Lambeth Council to grant planning permission to demolish their homes, in the mistaken belief that they would be able to move into new homes to be built on the site. Some of these residents now face eviction. Have you received similar reports and, if so, how are you responding?
  • 'How to Lease’ guide

    • Reference: 2018/5208
    • Question by: Siân Berry
    • Meeting date: 20 December 2018
    When will you publish your ‘How to Lease’ guide giving Londoners the information they need to make informed choices about buying and living in a leasehold property?
  • Leasehold enfranchisement

    • Reference: 2018/5209
    • Question by: Siân Berry
    • Meeting date: 20 December 2018
    Could you publish your response to the Law Commission consultation on leasehold enfranchisement?