Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

  • Fare Evasion (Supplementary) [10]

    • Question by: Bob Blackman
    • Meeting date: 05 December 2007
    Without getting into the merits or otherwise of bendy buses, obviously one of the clear concerns is that the rear portion of the buses is not monitored. Is there a consideration now then that you would concentrate RPIs and suchlike on such routes, where fare evasion is particularly a problem?
  • Fare Evasion (Supplementary) [13]

    • Question by: Bob Blackman
    • Meeting date: 05 December 2007
    The reason I raised that is that the number 18 bus route that runs through my constituency carries two million passengers a year, or thereabouts. In a recent exercise over 100 people were caught in an hour, without having paid a proper fare. That suggests that anecdotal evidence that people just do not bother paying if they get on the rear portion of those buses is borne out by reality, and if there is a concentration on routes such as that, it must reduce the amount of money that is evaded. Would you not agree that is a useful way...
  • Abandoned Cooler tube proposals (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Bob Blackman
    • Meeting date: 05 December 2007
    Have you got any idea when we will actually hear when this will all happen?
  • Abandoned Cooler tube proposals (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Bob Blackman
    • Meeting date: 05 December 2007
    In the spring. Is that the spring of next year or 2009 or later?
  • Abandoned Cooler tube proposals (Supplementary) [4]

    • Question by: Bob Blackman
    • Meeting date: 05 December 2007
    One of the considerations that I would like you to take away, and I do not expect an answer now, is about the timings on the Metropolitan Line trains on the signboards that seem to have disappeared because no one can rely on them. The fact that trains are due to appear is listed now, but without the actual time delay and it appears because of frequent breakdowns and problems that we have got on the rolling stock, that that is what is happening and a lot of commuters are concerned about that.
  • Abandoned Cooler tube proposals (Supplementary) [5]

    • Question by: Bob Blackman
    • Meeting date: 05 December 2007
    I listened to your comments about the requirement to do the Metropolitan Line, which runs right the way through my constituency. Obviously one of the concerns that most people have is that, in some way, shape or form, the various different station upgrades and improvements to the line are going to be delayed or even worse, postponed. Can you give us a guarantee now about when the work will be carried out, or whether that will be included within this Metronet review?
  • Traffic (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Bob Blackman
    • Meeting date: 06 December 2006
    Could I take you to outer London as opposed to inner London? What proposals do you have, if any, to improve the North Circular?
  • Metronet (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Bob Blackman
    • Meeting date: 06 December 2006
    We have the contract which many people said in the beginning was not going to work and did not have teeth. Would it be fair, from your perspective, to say that those people that said all those things were right in the first place?
  • Metronet (Supplementary) [3]

    • Question by: Bob Blackman
    • Meeting date: 06 December 2006
    To summarise what you have said about Metronet, we could say that the performance is bad but not bad enough. Here we have a contract which relies upon a mutual partnership, effectively, but it all seems to be one way traffic. The thing we want to hear is what you are going to do about getting continuous performance improvements from Metronet?
  • No. 6 Bus

    • Reference: 2006/0453-1
    • Question by: Bob Blackman
    • Meeting date: 06 December 2006
    I have received a large volume of complaints from residents on Donnington Road, Brent, concerning the re-routing of the Number 6 bus on their road. Despite collecting over 150 signatures against this re-routing, which has made the residents lives a misery through increased noise at night, TfL still went ahead with the decision anyway. Will you now undertake to review this routing arrangement, given the objections of local residents, and the detrimental effect it is having on the local area?