Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 2

  • Dissolution of LFEPA (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Fiona Twycross
    • Meeting date: 02 December 2015
    Fiona Twycross AM: I wanted to correct the impression that was given that the way it has been operating at the moment has been simply about opposition Members [on LFEPA] getting at the Mayor. The fact is that the Mayor has insisted on managing by Direction even when there has not been an impasse, including on issues over which there has been cross‑party agreement by LFEPA Members. I just wondered if you could focus a little bit on what impact the Mayor’s insistence on management by Direction has had. To be honest, we have had Directions on all sorts of...
  • Dissolution of LFEPA (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Richard Tracey
    • Meeting date: 02 December 2015
    Richard Tracey AM: Chairman, probably this is one for you as the politician of the two of you. The fact is, surely, that government, particularly local government, has been changing very considerably over recent years. That is accepted. The straight point to you: is it not correct that perhaps LFEPA in its current form is out of date and past its sell‑by date, really?
  • New Technology (Supplementary) [4]

    • Question by: Fiona Twycross
    • Meeting date: 02 December 2015
    Fiona Twycross AM: We obviously have to make sensible use of resources in the face of cuts. Some of the new technology that could come online is really interesting and will offer exciting possibilities, but do you agree with the Londoner who contacted me yesterday to say that £283,000 for a website rebuild is bordering on scandalous?
  • Affordable Homes for Rent

    • Reference: 2010/0105-1
    • Question by: Jenny Jones
    • Meeting date: 20 October 2010
    What barriers prevent a greater proportion of affordable homes being delivered for rent, given the planned changes to housing benefit?
  • Strategic Leadership

    • Reference: 2010/0106-1
    • Question by: Nicky Gavron
    • Meeting date: 20 October 2010
    Is there adequate strategic leadership of housing policy and its implementation in London?
  • Housing Devolution

    • Reference: 2010/0107-1
    • Question by: Mike Tuffrey
    • Meeting date: 20 October 2010
    What are the risks and opportunities of the proposal for a new Housing and Regeneration department within the GLA?
  • Families in Housing Need

    • Reference: 2010/0108-1
    • Question by: Steve O'Connell
    • Meeting date: 20 October 2010
    How have the prospects for families in housing need improved since the current Mayoralty began?
  • Strategic Leadership (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Andrew Boff
    • Meeting date: 20 October 2010
    Could you, Mr Blakeway, promise me not to carry anything over from the last administration with regard to housing? Could you promise three things really: first of all, could you promise not to disappoint Londoners with oversold targets that are unachievable? Could you promise me not to raise the aspirations of Londoners and then dash those hopes and blame someone else? Could you also promise not to build a home for somebody in housing need but actually deliver a rabbit hutch? So in short, can you assure me that the strategies will be realistic, achievable and honest, which would be...
  • Strategic Leadership (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Steve O'Connell
    • Meeting date: 20 October 2010
    Richard, a question for you. Would you not agree, following on from that debate you just had, that inflexible percentage targets are indeed a tired and lazy analysis of the needs of our residents?
  • Housing Devolution (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Murad Qureshi
    • Meeting date: 20 October 2010
    Last week it was announced that the Office for Tenants and Social Landlords, otherwise known as Tenant Services Authority (TSA), was to be devolved and no longer a public body. I am just wondering in the context of housing devolution in London where all these regulatory powers will be going.