Search questions

• Reference: 2021/1202
• Question by: David Kurten
• Meeting date: 18 March 2021

Given that the black cab taxi fleet has now shrunk to less than 14,000 vehicles and many drivers are struggling to earn a living, let alone buy a new electric wheelchair accessible taxi for more than £60,000, do you think the black cab has a future in London?

• Reference: 2021/1203
• Question by: David Kurten
• Meeting date: 18 March 2021

Are you aware that less than 0.5% (half a percent) of all private hire vehicles are wheelchair accessible (and most of those are school run mini buses)? What will you do to see that London’s ageing and disabled population can get around if there are no purpose built wheelchair accessible taxis in the future, because they’ve been priced out of the market?

• Reference: 2021/1204
• Question by: David Kurten
• Meeting date: 18 March 2021

What is your future plan for Taxis and Private Hire Vehicles, given, in my view, the poor outcomes from your policies over the last five years?

• Reference: 2021/1205
• Question by: David Kurten
• Meeting date: 18 March 2021

What will you do to rebuild the taxi trade and reverse the declining numbers of black cabs in London seen over the last five years?

• Reference: 2021/1206
• Question by: David Kurten
• Meeting date: 18 March 2021

Uber maintained for a long period of time that the acceptance of private hire bookings by a licensed London PHV Operator acting as agent for drivers would comply with the regulatory regime. Given the recent Appeal Court ruling that Uber drivers are employees, does the mayor believe that Uber have been operating in London outside of the PHV regulatory regime since TfL granted them an Operator Licence in 2012?

• Reference: 2021/1207
• Question by: David Kurten
• Meeting date: 18 March 2021

With reference to your answer to my question MQ2020/1050, it concerns me that non-crime hate incidents are criminalising people for expressing their opinions within the law and this was not recognised in your answer. For instance, Harry Miller, that Mr Justice Julian Knowles concluded his tweets were: “lawful and that there was not the slightest risk that he would commit a criminal offence by continuing to tweet”. Does the Metropolitan Police Service recognise the fundamental right that people who have expressed opinions within the law should not be criminalised in this way and have non-crime hate incident allegations recorded against...

• Reference: 2021/1208
• Question by: David Kurten
• Meeting date: 18 March 2021

In your answer to my question MQ2020/1052, you stated that during the period 2014 to 2019, 9,473 people had non-crime hate incidents recorded against them by the Metropolitan Police Service. How do you expect Londoners to trust or have any credibility in these figures, when the case of Harry Miller revealed that people expressing opinions within the law are been criminalised by having non-crime hate incidents recorded against them? Ref: https://www.london.gov.uk/questions/2020/1052

• Reference: 2021/1209
• Question by: David Kurten
• Meeting date: 18 March 2021

In the MailOnline article ‘Police log 120,000 ‘hate reports’ – but not ONE is a crime’, 13 February 2021, Harry Miller a former police officer and co-founder of the Fair Cop campaign group said: “Non-crime hate incident reports do not appear to have any usefulness as a crime prevention tool, but what they do have is a chilling effect on free speech because they make people think twice before saying or posting something on social media in the fear that it could land them with a criminal record. “These reports have allowed the police to become weaponised by woke activists...

• Reference: 2021/1194
• Question by: David Kurten
• Meeting date: 18 March 2021

What is the current anticipated opening date for Crossrail?

• Reference: 2021/1190
• Question by: David Kurten
• Meeting date: 18 March 2021

To what extent have your policies and statements as Mayor reflected common sense?