Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 2

  • Climate adaptation and the London Fire Brigade (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Tony Devenish
    • Meeting date: 10 February 2022
    Tony Devenish AM: At the Regeneration Committee a couple of years ago we talked about estates strategy and, when we asked about the carbon footprint of the strategy, we were met by silence. I do remember the meeting very clearly. Would you say you are leading on carbon matters that have been mentioned by Assembly Member Polanski in terms of the estate and not the appliances of the LFB? To the Deputy Mayor, would you be up to a pilot of possibly merging an LAS and an LFB station and making it a zero-carbon best-in-practice project?
  • Climate adaptation and the London Fire Brigade

    • Reference: 2022/0479
    • Question by: Zack Polanski
    • Meeting date: 10 February 2022
    How is the London Fire Brigade prioritising the need for adaptation in our climate emergency?
  • Addressing inequalities in Coronavirus response (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Susan Hall
    • Meeting date: 10 June 2021
    Susan Hall AM: This is addressed to the Mayor. Good morning. Do you think your Health in All Policies approach was successful when implementing your Street Space schemes across London?
  • Addressing inequalities in Coronavirus response (Supplementary) [3]

    • Question by: Zack Polanski
    • Meeting date: 10 June 2021
    Zack Polanski AM: My question is for you, Mr Mayor, and then I will come to the Fire Commissioner. You spoke with Assembly Member Sheikh before about TfL and inequality. I want to ask you, though, about the LFB. What role does it have in tackling inequality in London? Would it be better for it to have a clear inequalities strategy?
  • New Bus for London

    • Reference: 2013/0018-1
    • Question by: Jenny Jones
    • Meeting date: 09 October 2013
    Will the cost of the New Bus for London push up bus fares?
  • Bow Roundabout - transparency

    • Reference: 2012/0005
    • Question by: Jenny Jones
    • Meeting date: 20 June 2012
    At which meeting (including date) was the decision taken not to go ahead in 2010 with the safety improvements at Bow Roundabout recommended in the Jacobs report, and what part did your transport adviser at that date play in the decision making process?
  • Performance of London Underground (Supplementary) [5]

    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 20 June 2012
    Can you understand Londoners' frustrations? People expect you to take time off as Mayor, but when there are so many problems on the Tube that commuters face and they see you off on promotional book tours in the United States and so on, can you understand Londoners' frustration with you?
  • Performance of London Underground (Supplementary) [6]

    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 20 June 2012
    I have a question to the Mayor. Had you perhaps underestimated how difficult it would be running the Tube network?
  • Bow Roundabout - transparency (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Jenny Jones
    • Meeting date: 20 June 2012
    No, I am concerned about the Bow Roundabout aspect. I know about the Newham problem and it is a problem. The reason I keep asking these questions - and I have had endless questions to you and lots of Freedom of Information requests of TfL - is because these decisions, especially when they result in the deaths of road users, in this instance two deaths in just over a month of cyclists, these decisions have to be accountable. They have to be transparent.
  • Bow Roundabout - transparency (Supplementary) [5]

    • Question by: Jenny Jones
    • Meeting date: 20 June 2012
    Thank you very much for that. We will pick that answer over later. Thank you. The thing is I have a list here of lots and lots of meetings that happened between your advisor and officers and other meetings as well, but we still cannot see where exactly the recommendations in the Jacobs Report were rejected because the recommendations in the Jacobs Report were for a much safer system for cyclists. So at some point you are suggesting that your TfL director of surface whatever was the person who rejected that Jacobs Report and decided to go with the less...