Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

  • Jack Lemley (Supplementary) [4]

    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 15 November 2006
    I might have to ask elsewhere. Let us get it in context. We now know that he had expressed concerns - I think was your phrase - that the project was not on track. This is not a rogue member of the Board, this is the person who is the Chair of the Authority expressing those concerns. What specifically were the concerns that he raised?
  • Jack Lemley (Supplementary) [14]

    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 15 November 2006
    That came from some other source that speculation did it?
  • Jack Lemley (Supplementary) [15]

    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 15 November 2006
    What was the line that was put out, can you remind me?
  • Jack Lemley (Supplementary) [16]

    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 15 November 2006
    When Mr Lemley left, as I recall, it was suggested that it was because of ill health. Is that correct?
  • Jack Lemley (Supplementary) [18]

    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 15 November 2006
    You do not know whether there was any provision that might give rise to discussion on that?
  • Jack Lemley (Supplementary) [19]

    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 15 November 2006
    I understand. Was there any payment made to Mr Lemley in relation to the termination of his position?
  • Infrastructure recovery (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 08 December 2004
    Bob Neill (AM): I am sure that is right. It is a shame that GOL are not here so that we could have heard it be said. Brian Coleman (Chair): Indeed, we wish Mr Kowalczyk was here, so we could pay tribute to him this morning, but unfortunately he is not. I am sure, however, his spies are in the audience somewhere. Can I just ask, Mr Mayer, are you saying we need, in your professional opinion as an officer ' or 'mere bureaucrat,' as you describe yourself ' that we need an office of emergency planning in London?
  • Infrastructure recovery (Supplementary) [6]

    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 08 December 2004
    An important part of what we want to try to achieve is to reassure Londoners that proper procedures are in place. What reassurance is there? What can I say to my constituency as to who is in charge at the moment for planning a) for resilience, b) for recovery? Secondly, who is providing the money for those, and where is it going?
  • Infrastructure recovery (Supplementary) [7]

    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 08 December 2004
    Is that the answer to all the questions? The whole lot? At the moment, we have a scenario where the boroughs have some emergency planning, civil defence, old-fashioned-type powers. LFEPA has some powers. The other emergency services have a smattering of powers. Are you satisfied, Mr Mayer, that we have an accountable form of joining those together, or do we have a reassurance gap, as far as London is concerned? It may be being done by Nick Raynsford, but how do we assure Londoners that it is being'?