Search questions

• Reference: 2013/0018-1
• Question by: Jenny Jones
• Meeting date: 09 October 2013

Will the cost of the New Bus for London push up bus fares?

• Reference: 2012/0005
• Question by: Jenny Jones
• Meeting date: 20 June 2012

At which meeting (including date) was the decision taken not to go ahead in 2010 with the safety improvements at Bow Roundabout recommended in the Jacobs report, and what part did your transport adviser at that date play in the decision making process?

• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 20 June 2012

Can you understand Londoners' frustrations? People expect you to take time off as Mayor, but when there are so many problems on the Tube that commuters face and they see you off on promotional book tours in the United States and so on, can you understand Londoners' frustration with you?

• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 20 June 2012

I have a question to the Mayor. Had you perhaps underestimated how difficult it would be running the Tube network?

• Question by: Jenny Jones
• Meeting date: 20 June 2012

No, I am concerned about the Bow Roundabout aspect. I know about the Newham problem and it is a problem. The reason I keep asking these questions - and I have had endless questions to you and lots of Freedom of Information requests of TfL - is because these decisions, especially when they result in the deaths of road users, in this instance two deaths in just over a month of cyclists, these decisions have to be accountable. They have to be transparent.

• Question by: Jenny Jones
• Meeting date: 20 June 2012

Thank you very much for that. We will pick that answer over later. Thank you. The thing is I have a list here of lots and lots of meetings that happened between your advisor and officers and other meetings as well, but we still cannot see where exactly the recommendations in the Jacobs Report were rejected because the recommendations in the Jacobs Report were for a much safer system for cyclists. So at some point you are suggesting that your TfL director of surface whatever was the person who rejected that Jacobs Report and decided to go with the less...

• Question by: Jenny Jones
• Meeting date: 20 June 2012

How many will there be?

• Reference: 2003/0241
• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 11 June 2003

Will the information provided to people during the current consultation on the East London River Crossing include an assessment of the impacts of extra traffic on air quality and health in East London? If the building of this bridge does generate extra traffic, will it make it more, or less likely that you meet the Governments targets, and the E.U. targets, for air quality in the boroughs of Newham, Greenwich and Lewisham? .

• Reference: 2003/0242
• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 11 June 2003

In the London Mayor's response to Jenny Jone's question 760/2003 he states that 'the options for river crossings were considered in a range of earlier studies'. Did any of these studies look at alternative sites for a road river crossing? Did such sites include provision of a local bridge with only one lane each way for private motorised transport? Did any of these sites include a bridge with provision for only buses, pedestrians and cyclists? .

• Reference: 2003/0243
• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 11 June 2003

Do you accept the conclusion in the John Elliot report 'a solution looking for a problem' (T2000, Mar 03) that the East London River Crossing will be capable of handling between 6,000 to 8,000 vehicles an hour in the morning peak? .